From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Tengda Wu" <wutengda@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/23] perf annotate: Adapt arch__dwarf_regnum() for arm64
Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2026 13:07:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260808130708.749031F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260808122400.2961238-7-wutengda@huaweicloud.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The patch's fix to enable arm64 register parsing is unreachable and ineffective because the callers still unconditionally require a register prefix.
- [Medium] The new optional prefix logic in `arch__dwarf_regnum()` fails to strip the opening bracket from memory operands.
--
--- Patch [6]: [PATCH v4 06/23] perf annotate: Adapt arch__dwarf_regnum() for arm64 ---
commit 1ed2e0e5199a9033fdb64817a106aecaa0871796
Author: Tengda Wu <wutengda@huaweicloud.com>
perf annotate: Adapt arch__dwarf_regnum() for arm64
This commit makes the register prefix check in arch__dwarf_regnum() optional
to support arm64 assembly syntax. It also extends the delimiter set in
strpbrk() to handle bracketed memory operands and removes the static
qualifier from arch__dwarf_regnum().
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> index df70e95a84704..9d8b4d6b859b8 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -2472,21 +2472,23 @@ int annotate_check_args(void)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int arch__dwarf_regnum(const struct arch *arch, const char *str)
> +int arch__dwarf_regnum(const struct arch *arch, const char *str)
[Severity: Medium]
Does this change fully enable arm64 register parsing?
Looking at the callers of arch__dwarf_regnum(), they appear to still
unconditionally enforce the presence of a register prefix character.
For example, extract_reg_offset() checks:
if (arch->objdump.register_char == 0)
return -1;
And annotate_get_insn_location() strictly requires a match:
if (*s == arch->objdump.register_char) {
op_loc->reg1 = arch__dwarf_regnum(arch, s);
}
Will these un-updated callers prevent arm64 registers from actually being
parsed?
> {
> - const char *p;
> + const char *p = str;
> char *regname, *q;
> int reg;
>
> - p = strchr(str, arch->objdump.register_char);
> - if (p == NULL)
> - return -1;
> + if (arch->objdump.register_char) {
> + p = strchr(str, arch->objdump.register_char);
> + if (p == NULL)
> + return -1;
> + }
>
> regname = strdup(p);
> if (regname == NULL)
> return -1;
>
> - q = strpbrk(regname, ",) ");
> + q = strpbrk(regname, ",)] ");
[Severity: Medium]
Since the prefix check is now optional, will p point to the opening bracket
for arm64 memory operands like [x2, #8]?
This strpbrk() strips the closing bracket ], but is there logic to strip the
leading [ before the string is passed to get_dwarf_regnum()? Can this pass
[x2 as the register name and cause it to be rejected?
> if (q)
> *q = '\0';
>
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260808122400.2961238-1-wutengda@huaweicloud.com?part=6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-08 13:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-08 12:23 [PATCH v4 00/23] perf arm64: Support data type profiling Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 01/23] perf capstone: Fix arm64 jump/adrp disassembly mismatch with objdump Tengda Wu
2026-08-10 13:08 ` Shuai Xue
2026-08-11 2:27 ` Tengda Wu
2026-08-11 3:25 ` Shuai Xue
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 02/23] perf llvm: Fix arm64 adrp instruction " Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 13:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-11 2:37 ` Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 03/23] perf annotate-arm64: Generalize arm64_mov__parse to support more instructions Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 13:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-11 3:19 ` Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 04/23] perf annotate-arm64: Handle load and store instructions Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 13:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-11 7:07 ` Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 05/23] perf dwarf-regs: Adapt get_dwarf_regnum() for arm64 Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 13:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-11 7:18 ` Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 06/23] perf annotate: Adapt arch__dwarf_regnum() " Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 13:07 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-11 8:10 ` Tengda Wu
2026-08-11 6:33 ` Shuai Xue
2026-08-11 8:16 ` Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 07/23] perf annotate: Introduce extract_op_location callback for arch-specific parsing Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 13:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 08/23] perf annotate-arm64: Implement extract_op_location() callback Tengda Wu
2026-08-11 6:50 ` Shuai Xue
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 09/23] perf annotate: Deduplicate overlapping ARM SPE events for data type profiling Tengda Wu
2026-08-10 6:57 ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 10/23] perf arm-spe: Set default synthesized event period to 1 Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 11/23] perf annotate-data: Extract invalidate_reg_state() as a common helper Tengda Wu
2026-08-11 7:09 ` Shuai Xue
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 12/23] perf annotate-arm64: Enable instruction tracking support Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 13:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 13/23] perf annotate-arm64: Track return type after call instructions Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 13:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 14/23] perf annotate-arm64: Support load instruction tracking Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 13:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-11 7:36 ` Shuai Xue
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 15/23] perf annotate-arm64: Support store " Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 13:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-11 8:00 ` Shuai Xue
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 16/23] perf annotate-data: Expand type_state_reg imm_value to u64 Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 13:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-11 8:10 ` Shuai Xue
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 17/23] perf annotate-data: Track imm_value for stack variables Tengda Wu
2026-08-11 8:16 ` Shuai Xue
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 18/23] perf annotate-arm64: Support stack variable tracking Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 13:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-11 8:24 ` Shuai Xue
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 19/23] perf annotate-arm64: Support 'mov' instruction tracking Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 13:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-11 8:37 ` Shuai Xue
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 20/23] perf annotate-arm64: Support 'add' " Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 13:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-11 8:45 ` Shuai Xue
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 21/23] perf annotate-arm64: Support 'adrp' instruction to track global variables Tengda Wu
2026-08-11 8:50 ` Shuai Xue
2026-08-08 12:23 ` [PATCH v4 22/23] perf annotate-arm64: Support per-cpu variable access tracking Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 13:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-08 12:24 ` [PATCH v4 23/23] perf annotate-arm64: Support 'mrs' instruction to track 'current' pointer Tengda Wu
2026-08-08 13:20 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260808130708.749031F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=wutengda@huaweicloud.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.