All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: mbenes@suse.cz, jikos@kernel.org, song@kernel.org,
	joe.lawrence@redhat.com, pmladek@suse.com, jpoimboe@kernel.org
Cc: "Yafang Shao" <laoar.shao@gmail.com>, live-patching@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/9] livepatch: Fix wrong index in funcs cleanup error path
Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2026 09:28:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260809092850.28E6B1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260809091954.22930-2-laoar.shao@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] The patch introduces a double free vulnerability on the `funcs` allocation error path.
--

--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v5 1/9] livepatch: Fix wrong index in funcs cleanup error path ---
commit c03811c85b7c79e0d681d9978c346e4424c48a99
Author: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>

livepatch: Fix wrong index in funcs cleanup error path

This commit modifies the cleanup loop in livepatch_mod_init() to use the
index j instead of i when kzalloc() fails for a function array. This
attempts to prevent leaking previously allocated function arrays.

> diff --git a/scripts/livepatch/init.c b/scripts/livepatch/init.c
> index f14d8c8fb35fa..16aff8f736eb6 100644
> --- a/scripts/livepatch/init.c
> +++ b/scripts/livepatch/init.c
> @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ static int __init livepatch_mod_init(void)
>  		if (!funcs) {
>  			ret = -ENOMEM;
>  			for (int j = 0; j < i; j++)
> -				kfree(objs[i].funcs);
> +				kfree(objs[j].funcs);

[Severity: High]
Does this introduce a double free in livepatch_mod_init()?

When the inner loop here frees objs[j].funcs, it leaves the dangling pointer
in the objs array. The code then jumps to err_free_objs, which iterates over
all objects and frees the arrays again:

err_free_objs:
	for (int i = 0; i < nr_objs; i++)
		kfree(objs[i].funcs);

Since the pointers weren't set to NULL in the inner loop, won't the
err_free_objs cleanup loop free the identical memory allocations a
second time?

>  			goto err_free_objs;
>  		}
>

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260809091954.22930-1-laoar.shao@gmail.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-09  9:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-09  9:19 [PATCH v5 0/9] livepatch: Introduce replace set support Yafang Shao
2026-08-09  9:19 ` [PATCH v5 1/9] livepatch: Fix wrong index in funcs cleanup error path Yafang Shao
2026-08-09  9:28   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-09  9:36     ` Yafang Shao
2026-08-09  9:19 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] livepatch: Make klp_find_func() non static Yafang Shao
2026-08-09  9:32   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-09  9:39     ` Yafang Shao
2026-08-09  9:19 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] livepatch: Call klp_init_patch_early() earlier Yafang Shao
2026-08-09  9:40   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-10  3:53     ` Yafang Shao
2026-08-09  9:19 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] livepatch: Implement replace set for scoped atomic replace Yafang Shao
2026-08-09  9:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-10  3:45     ` Yafang Shao
2026-08-09  9:19 ` [PATCH v5 5/9] livepatch: Deprecate stack_order Yafang Shao
2026-08-09  9:19 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] selftests: livepatch: Adapt atomic replace tests to provides/obsoletes Yafang Shao
2026-08-09  9:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-09  9:45     ` Yafang Shao
2026-08-09  9:19 ` [PATCH v5 7/9] selftests: livepatch: Add provides/obsoletes test scenarios Yafang Shao
2026-08-09  9:31   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-10  3:34     ` Yafang Shao
2026-08-09  9:19 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] selftests: livepatch: Add test for state ID conflict across provides Yafang Shao
2026-08-09  9:19 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] selftests: livepatch: Add test for function " Yafang Shao
2026-08-09  9:49   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260809092850.28E6B1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=jikos@kernel.org \
    --cc=joe.lawrence@redhat.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
    --cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.