From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Marek Vasut" <marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org>
Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: display: panel: Document 10" Raspberry Pi Touch Display 2
Date: Sun, 09 Aug 2026 20:17:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260809201717.BDDF41F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260809200107.842945-1-marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] Incorrect use of `additionalProperties: false` when inheriting from a common schema via `allOf`.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: display: panel: Document 10" Raspberry Pi Touch Display 2 ---
commit 24ac9b0c966cb6294b25fc745f5c098627bda264
Author: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org>
Date: Sun Aug 9 19:58:50 2026 +0000
dt-bindings: display: panel: Document 10" Raspberry Pi Touch Display 2
This commit documents the 10" Raspberry Pi Touch Display 2 MIPI-DSI TFT LCD
panel based on the Ilitek ILI79600A controller.
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/ilitek,ili79600a.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/ilitek,ili79600a.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/ilitek,ili79600a.yaml
[ ... ]
> +allOf:
> + - $ref: panel-common.yaml#
> +
> +properties:
[ ... ]
> + backlight: true
> +
> +required:
> + - compatible
> + - reg
> +
> +additionalProperties: false
[Severity: Medium]
Should this use unevaluatedProperties: false instead?
Because this binding inherits from panel-common.yaml# in the allOf block,
using additionalProperties: false will cause the schema to reject any valid
inherited properties (such as rotation or port) when evaluating a device tree.
Using unevaluatedProperties: false would correctly evaluate the properties
provided by the $ref, which would also allow the redundant local declaration
of backlight: true to be removed.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260809200107.842945-1-marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-09 20:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-09 19:58 [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: display: panel: Document 10" Raspberry Pi Touch Display 2 Marek Vasut
2026-08-09 19:58 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/panel: ilitek-ili9882t: Make enable GPIO optional Marek Vasut
2026-08-09 19:58 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/panel: ilitek-ili9882t: Set prepare_prev_first Marek Vasut
2026-08-10 9:45 ` Neil Armstrong
2026-08-09 19:58 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/panel: ilitek-ili9882t: Add support for Ilitek ILI79600A-based panels Marek Vasut
2026-08-09 20:17 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260809201717.BDDF41F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.