From: Zqiang <qiang.zhang@linux.dev>
To: paulmck@kernel.org, frederic@kernel.org,
neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org, joelagnelf@nvidia.com,
urezki@gmail.com, boqun@kernel.org
Cc: qiang.zhang@linux.dev, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, leitao@debian.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] srcu: Fix WARN_ON() for timer_delete_sync() in cleanup_srcu_struct()
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2026 18:55:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260810105522.19022-1-qiang.zhang@linux.dev> (raw)
The WARN_ON() for timer_delete_sync() means that the caller forgot to
call srcu_barrier() before cleanup. however, it still can trigger even
when srcu_barrier() was properly called.
When a SRCU grace period ends and ss_state < SRCU_SIZE_BIG, the mask=~0
causes delay_work timer be queued on every online CPU regardless of
whether it's sdp->srcu_cblist has callbacks. srcu_barrier() only wait
srcu_barrier_head's callbacks to complete, however, the srcu_barrier_head
will not be inserted into an empty sdp->srcu_cblist. after that, when
cleanup_srcu_struct() finds a pending delay_work timer on a CPU with no
callbacks, triggering a false positive.
This commit therefore add rcu_segcblist_n_cbs() to WARN_ON(), make the
warning triggers only when the timer is still pending and there are actual
outstanding callbacks.
Fixes: 05c3e88488ed ("srcu: Queue sdp->work when the delay timer is successfully deleted")
Reported-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202608060833.bce92909-lkp@intel.com/
Tested-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang@linux.dev>
---
kernel/rcu/srcutree.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
index 35fface51d50..090dddfc7463 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
@@ -753,8 +753,9 @@ void cleanup_srcu_struct(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
// Call srcu_barrier() before this cleanup_srcu_struct()
// to avoid triggering this WARN_ON().
- if (WARN_ON(timer_delete_sync(&sdp->delay_work)) &&
- rcu_cpu_beenfullyonline(sdp->cpu))
+ if (WARN_ON(timer_delete_sync(&sdp->delay_work) &&
+ rcu_segcblist_n_cbs(&sdp->srcu_cblist)) &&
+ rcu_cpu_beenfullyonline(sdp->cpu))
queue_work_on(sdp->cpu, rcu_gp_wq, &sdp->work);
flush_work(&sdp->work);
if (WARN_ON(rcu_segcblist_n_cbs(&sdp->srcu_cblist)))
--
2.17.1
next reply other threads:[~2026-08-10 10:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-10 10:55 Zqiang [this message]
2026-08-10 14:04 ` [PATCH v2] srcu: Fix WARN_ON() for timer_delete_sync() in cleanup_srcu_struct() Breno Leitao
2026-08-10 23:31 ` Zqiang
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-08-11 0:29 Zqiang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260810105522.19022-1-qiang.zhang@linux.dev \
--to=qiang.zhang@linux.dev \
--cc=boqun@kernel.org \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.