From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Wei Hu" <weh@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/13] mshv: default to safe partition CPU features
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2026 12:57:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260810125723.0F87C1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260810124527.1409634-8-weh@linux.microsoft.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Legacy V1 API callers requesting nested virtualization will no longer receive the nested virtualization CPU feature, breaking ABI compatibility.
--
--- Patch [7]: [PATCH v2 07/13] mshv: default to safe partition CPU features ---
commit 01e208d51ef280f67802036c435ff766571437ae
Author: Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>
mshv: default to safe partition CPU features
For legacy create-partition callers, disable all processor and xsave
features first, then enable only the default feature set known to be
supported. Passing an all-zero disabled feature mask can make SEV-SNP
partition creation fail on Hyper-V.
> diff --git a/drivers/hv/mshv_root_main.c b/drivers/hv/mshv_root_main.c
> index 712f45dcef60c..ad2e708fd7539 100644
> --- a/drivers/hv/mshv_root_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/hv/mshv_root_main.c
> @@ -2373,15 +2373,102 @@ static long mshv_ioctl_process_pt_flags(void __user *user_arg, u64 *pt_flags,
> args.pt_isolation >= MSHV_PT_ISOLATION_COUNT)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + memset(cr_props, 0, sizeof(*cr_props));
> + memset(isol_props, 0, sizeof(*isol_props));
> disabled_procs = &cr_props->disabled_processor_features;
> disabled_xsave = &cr_props->disabled_processor_xsave_features;
>
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_64)
> + /* Disable all processor features first. */
> + for (i = 0; i < HV_PARTITION_PROCESSOR_FEATURES_BANKS; i++)
> + disabled_procs->as_uint64[i] = U64_MAX;
> +
> + /* Enable default features that are known to be supported. */
> + disabled_procs->sse3_support = 0;
[ ... ]
> + disabled_procs->cet_ss_support = 0;
> + disabled_procs->cet_ibt_support = 0;
> + disabled_procs->vmx_exception_inject_support = 0;
[Severity: High]
Does this omission break legacy callers requesting nested virtualization?
Since all features are disabled by default (U64_MAX), and
disabled_procs->nested_virt_support is not explicitly set to 0 in this
default list, won't nested virtualization remain disabled for the guest CPU
even if the legacy caller sets MSHV_PT_BIT_NESTED_VIRTUALIZATION?
Later in mshv_ioctl_process_pt_flags(), the creation capability is enabled
if requested:
if (args.pt_flags & BIT(MSHV_PT_BIT_NESTED_VIRTUALIZATION))
*pt_flags |= HV_PARTITION_CREATION_FLAG_NESTED_VIRTUALIZATION_CAPABLE;
However, because the CPU feature itself is left disabled by the new safe
defaults list, it appears this will break nested virtualization for V1 ABI
callers.
> +
> + disabled_xsave->as_uint64 = U64_MAX;
> + disabled_xsave->xsave_support = 0;
> + disabled_xsave->xsaveopt_support = 0;
> + disabled_xsave->avx_support = 0;
> +#endif
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260810124527.1409634-1-weh@linux.microsoft.com?part=7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-10 12:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-10 12:44 [PATCH v2 00/13] mshv: add SEV-SNP support for MSHV root partitions Wei Hu
2026-08-10 12:44 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] mshv: add SEV-SNP UAPI definitions Wei Hu
2026-08-10 12:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-10 12:44 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] mshv: add SEV-SNP PSP request hypercall Wei Hu
2026-08-10 12:44 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] mshv: add SEV-SNP isolated page hypercalls Wei Hu
2026-08-10 12:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-10 12:44 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] mshv: wire SEV-SNP partition ioctls Wei Hu
2026-08-10 13:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-10 12:44 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] hyperv: fix hv_input_get_system_property layout for SNP status Wei Hu
2026-08-10 18:59 ` Wei Liu
2026-08-10 12:45 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] mshv: detect and report SEV-SNP support at init Wei Hu
2026-08-10 12:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-10 18:53 ` Wei Liu
2026-08-10 12:45 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] mshv: default to safe partition CPU features Wei Hu
2026-08-10 12:57 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-10 12:45 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] mshv: accept partial CPU feature banks Wei Hu
2026-08-10 12:45 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] mshv: define full processor and xsave feature masks Wei Hu
2026-08-10 12:45 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] mshv: unmap SNP memory before state teardown Wei Hu
2026-08-10 13:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-10 12:45 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] mshv: unlock SNP pages on panic for crashdump collection Wei Hu
2026-08-10 13:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-10 12:45 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] hyperv: add MSHV Dom0 root-partition boot enablement (EFI HvLoader) Wei Hu
2026-08-10 13:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-10 18:50 ` Wei Liu
2026-08-10 12:45 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] mshv: set up own SynIC registers on a nested root partition Wei Hu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260810125723.0F87C1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=weh@linux.microsoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.