From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Dmitry Antipov" <dmantipov@yandex.ru>
Cc: dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] input: sur40: fix error recovery in sur40_probe()
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2026 15:57:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260810155707.2C5751F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260810153509.124147-1-dmantipov@yandex.ru>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The driver frees the `sur40_state` structure synchronously in `sur40_disconnect()` while userspace may still hold open file descriptors to the V4L2 video device, leading to a Use-After-Free when the file is later closed or accessed.
- [High] Freeing `sur40->bulk_in_buffer` before unregistering the input device creates a use-after-free window if polling is active.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v2] input: sur40: fix error recovery in sur40_probe() ---
commit e90ee91ad15aa01f67bf74f5cd08571c1f3ecf61
Author: Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@yandex.ru>
input: sur40: fix error recovery in sur40_probe()
Since an input device which has passed 'input_register_device()' should
be released with 'input_unregister_device()', adjust 'sur40_probe()'
to do so and call 'input_free_device()' to handle device register error
only. To avoid V4L2 memory leak, ensure that 'v4l2_ctrl_handler_free()'
is called on all error handling paths, including the one after
'video_register_device()' failure.
Reported-by: syzbot+2a123f6269da57ffefaa@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=2a123f6269da57ffefaa
Fixes: 08b936012964 ("Input: sur40 - switch to using polled mode of input devices")
> diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/sur40.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/sur40.c
> index 77ec2c94b91fd..9208d8404c539 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/sur40.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/sur40.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -806,12 +807,17 @@ static int sur40_probe(struct usb_interface *interface,
>
> err_unreg_video:
> video_unregister_device(&sur40->vdev);
> +err_unreg_ctrl:
> + v4l2_ctrl_handler_free(&sur40->hdl);
> err_unreg_v4l2:
> v4l2_device_unregister(&sur40->v4l2);
> err_free_buffer:
> kfree(sur40->bulk_in_buffer);
> err_free_input:
> - input_free_device(input);
> + if (sur40->input)
> + input_unregister_device(input);
> + else
> + input_free_device(input);
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does freeing
sur40->bulk_in_buffer before unregistering the input device create a
use-after-free window?
If an error occurs after input_register_device() succeeds, userspace might
have already opened the device, starting the sur40_poll() poller.
Since the poller reads directly from sur40->bulk_in_buffer, freeing it here
before calling input_unregister_device() (which stops the poller) allows the
poller to access freed memory.
Should the error path call input_unregister_device() before freeing
the bulk_in_buffer?
> err_free_dev:
> kfree(sur40);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does the driver have a use-after-free
risk when handling the V4L2 video device lifecycle?
In sur40_disconnect(), the driver synchronously frees the sur40_state
structure:
video_unregister_device(&sur40->vdev);
...
kfree(sur40);
However, the video device (sur40->vdev) uses video_device_release_empty:
.release = video_device_release_empty,
If a userspace process still has the video device open when the USB device
is disconnected, closing the file descriptor later will invoke
vb2_fop_release(). This will dereference the freed vdev and its queue
locks.
Could the driver be adjusted to use a properly refcounted release callback
for the video device instead of video_device_release_empty and a
synchronous kfree()?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260810153509.124147-1-dmantipov@yandex.ru?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-10 15:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-10 14:13 [PATCH] input: sur40: fix error recovery in sur40_probe() Dmitry Antipov
2026-08-10 14:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-10 14:50 ` Vasileios Almpanis
2026-08-10 15:35 ` [PATCH v2] " Dmitry Antipov
2026-08-10 15:57 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-11 6:44 ` [PATCH v3] Input: " Dmitry Antipov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260810155707.2C5751F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dmantipov@yandex.ru \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.