All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Pecio <michal.pecio@gmail.com>
To: Arthur Gautier <baloo@superbaloo.net>
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
	Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xhci: fix lost bounce buffers on TDs spanning several ring segments
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2026 10:42:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260811104237.4500b578.michal.pecio@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260811033508.1050148-1-baloo@superbaloo.net>

On Tue, 11 Aug 2026 03:35:08 +0000, Arthur Gautier wrote:
> When a TD reaches a link TRB with data that is not aligned to the
> endpoint's wMaxPacketSize, xhci_align_td() stages the unalignable tail
> through the bounce buffer of the ring segment holding that link TRB.
> xhci_unmap_td_bounce_buffer() later unmaps it and, for IN transfers,
> copies the data back into the URB's buffer.
> 
> The enqueue path records the segment that was bounced in td->bounce_seg,
> under the assumption that a TD never spans more than two ring segments.
> That assumption does not hold: a TD large enough to span three or more
> segments crosses several link TRBs and can be bounced at each of them.
> Only the last one survives in td->bounce_seg, so every earlier bounce
> buffer is neither copied back nor DMA unmapped.
> 
> The URB still completes with actual_length equal to the requested length
> and no error, so the transfer looks successful while a wMaxPacketSize
> sized hole in the destination buffer silently keeps its previous
> contents. It also leaks a DMA mapping per dropped bounce.
> 
> This is reachable with a USB mass storage device behind xHCI backing a
> dm-verity target with 512 byte hash blocks. The device enumerates as
> SuperSpeed, so wMaxPacketSize is 1024, while dm-bufio issues one 512 byte
> bio per hash block. verity_prefetch_io() makes the block layer merge
> hundreds of them into a single request of up to 512 scatterlist entries
> of 512 bytes each. At 256 TRBs per ring segment such a TD spans three
> segments, and every segment boundary falls on an odd multiple of 512,
> i.e. unaligned to wMaxPacketSize. dm-bufio then caches a hash block
> holding stale data and dm-verity declares the metadata block corrupted:
> 
>   device-mapper: verity: 8:2: metadata block 10850 is corrupted

Quite nasty, and not everybody uses dm-verify in particular. It seems
corruption could also affect rare FAT filesystems with tiny clusters. 

> A reproducer running this under qemu is available at
> https://github.com/baloo/xhci-verity
> 
> The bounce state (bounce_buf, bounce_dma, bounce_len, bounce_offs)
> already lives on the ring segment, so there is nothing extra to track.
> Keep the first bounced segment in td->bounce_seg and, on completion,
> walk the segments the TD covers from there up to td->end_seg, handling
> every segment that still has a pending bounce.
> 
> Fixes: f9c589e142d0 ("xhci: TD-fragment, align the unsplittable case with a bounce buffer")
> Cc: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

Note: you don't need to list here the driver maintainer you are sending
this email to. And no need to *actually* send email to the stable list.

> Signed-off-by: Arthur Gautier <baloo@superbaloo.net>
> ---
>  drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
> index 4f98d8269625..4154e84420ac 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
> @@ -842,21 +842,18 @@ static void xhci_giveback_urb_in_irq(struct xhci_hcd *xhci,
>  	usb_hcd_giveback_urb(hcd, urb, status);
>  }
>  
> -static void xhci_unmap_td_bounce_buffer(struct xhci_hcd *xhci,
> -		struct xhci_ring *ring, struct xhci_td *td)
> +static void xhci_unmap_one_bounce_buffer(struct xhci_hcd *xhci,
> +		struct xhci_ring *ring, struct xhci_td *td,
> +		struct xhci_segment *seg)
>  {
>  	struct device *dev = xhci_to_hcd(xhci)->self.sysdev;
> -	struct xhci_segment *seg = td->bounce_seg;
>  	struct urb *urb = td->urb;
>  	size_t len;
>  
> -	if (!ring || !seg || !urb)
> -		return;
> -
>  	if (usb_urb_dir_out(urb)) {
>  		dma_unmap_single(dev, seg->bounce_dma, ring->bounce_buf_len,
>  				 DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> -		return;
> +		goto done;
>  	}
>  
>  	dma_unmap_single(dev, seg->bounce_dma, ring->bounce_buf_len,
> @@ -872,10 +869,37 @@ static void xhci_unmap_td_bounce_buffer(struct xhci_hcd *xhci,
>  		memcpy(urb->transfer_buffer + seg->bounce_offs, seg->bounce_buf,
>  		       seg->bounce_len);
>  	}
> +done:
>  	seg->bounce_len = 0;
>  	seg->bounce_offs = 0;
>  }
>  
> +static void xhci_unmap_td_bounce_buffer(struct xhci_hcd *xhci,
> +		struct xhci_ring *ring, struct xhci_td *td)
> +{
> +	struct xhci_segment *seg;
> +	unsigned int i;
> +
> +	if (!ring || !td->bounce_seg || !td->urb)
> +		return;

Tiny optimization nit: !td->bounce_seg is by far the most likely case,
so it could be first. The others guard against bugs and "never happen".

> +
> +	/*
> +	 * A TD that spans more than two ring segments crosses several link
> +	 * TRBs, and may have been aligned with a bounce buffer at each of
> +	 * them. Every bounce buffer lives on the segment whose link TRB it
> +	 * was needed for, so walk all segments the TD covers, starting at
> +	 * the first one that was bounced.
> +	 */

Hmm, AI patch? I think most people would write it like below :)

/* we have the first bounced seg, find and unmap all of them */

The code looks correct, though I would do it differently: store the
last bounce_seg and run the loop from td->start_seg to td->bounce_seg.
This avoids adding the 'if' during enqueue, and still works correctly
if the TD wraps around the whole ring so that end_seg == start_seg.

The driver is never supposed to create such TDs (they break the ring
expansion procedure) but I prefer more robust code if it costs nothing.
Bugs happen, or expansion could theoretically become more flexible.

Regards,
Michal

> +	seg = td->bounce_seg;
> +	for (i = 0; i < ring->num_segs; i++) {
> +		if (seg->bounce_len)
> +			xhci_unmap_one_bounce_buffer(xhci, ring, td, seg);
> +		if (seg == td->end_seg)
> +			break;
> +		seg = seg->next;
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  static void xhci_td_cleanup(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, struct xhci_td *td,
>  			    struct xhci_ring *ep_ring, int status)
>  {
> @@ -3674,8 +3698,15 @@ int xhci_queue_bulk_tx(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, gfp_t mem_flags,
>  						  &trb_buff_len,
>  						  ring->enq_seg)) {
>  					send_addr = ring->enq_seg->bounce_dma;
> -					/* assuming TD won't span 2 segs */
> -					td->bounce_seg = ring->enq_seg;
> +					/*
> +					 * A TD spanning several segments can be
> +					 * bounced once per segment boundary it
> +					 * crosses. Remember the first bounced
> +					 * segment, the rest are found by walking
> +					 * the TD's segments on completion.
> +					 */
> +					if (!td->bounce_seg)
> +						td->bounce_seg = ring->enq_seg;
>  				}
>  			}
>  		}
> -- 
> 2.55.0
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-11  8:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-11  3:35 [PATCH] xhci: fix lost bounce buffers on TDs spanning several ring segments Arthur Gautier
2026-08-11  8:42 ` Michal Pecio [this message]
2026-08-11  8:58   ` Michal Pecio
2026-08-12  0:27   ` Arthur Gautier
2026-08-11  8:42 ` Mathias Nyman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260811104237.4500b578.michal.pecio@gmail.com \
    --to=michal.pecio@gmail.com \
    --cc=baloo@superbaloo.net \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.