Re: [PATCH] clk: davinci: guard da850-specific init data references

[sashiko-bot@kernel.org]

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] The patch uses a non-existent Kconfig macro `CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_DAVINCI_DA850` to guard DA850-specific clock definitions, which will unconditionally disable them.
--

--- Patch [1]: [PATCH] clk: davinci: guard da850-specific init data references ---
commit 8310fd74805280b1ea31726bf5935e313dcdb916
Author: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>

clk: davinci: guard da850-specific init data references

This commit attempts to fix undefined reference link errors in COMPILE_TEST
builds by wrapping DA850-specific clock data and declarations in a new
preprocessor guard.

Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202608111912.YS4Vg7Jh-lkp@intel.com/

> diff --git a/drivers/clk/davinci/pll.c b/drivers/clk/davinci/pll.c
> index f73b0ac5d8a08..af95dc27f840d 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/davinci/pll.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/davinci/pll.c
> @@ -841,17 +841,23 @@ int of_davinci_pll_init(struct device *dev, struct device_node *node,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_DAVINCI_DA850

[Severity: High]
Does the CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_DAVINCI_DA850 Kconfig option actually exist?

It appears this should be checking CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI_DA850 instead. As
currently written, this guard evaluates to false unconditionally. Will this
cause DA850 devices to fail to boot because their early clocks and match
tables (in both pll.c and psc.c) are no longer compiled in?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260811190821.117485-1-rosenp@gmail.com?part=1