From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Yu-Chun Lin" <eleanor.lin@realtek.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 04/11] clk: realtek: Introduce common probe() and remove()
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2026 02:08:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260812020827.D656B1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260812020009.3480538-5-eleanor.lin@realtek.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] rtk_clk_remove() manually clears regmap pointers before devres unregisters the clocks, creating a fatal window for NULL pointer dereferences.
--
--- Patch [4]: [PATCH v13 04/11] clk: realtek: Introduce common probe() and remove() ---
commit 85dc7ea7ea58332e5239ff20ff6e6669d56fbb6a
Author: Cheng-Yu Lee <cylee12@realtek.com>
clk: realtek: Introduce common probe() and remove()
This commit introduces common probe and remove functions for Realtek clock
drivers. It handles setting up a shared regmap, registering clock hardware,
and optionally creating an auxiliary device for the reset controller.
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/realtek/clk-rtk-common.c b/drivers/clk/realtek/clk-rtk-common.c
> new file mode 100644
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/clk/realtek/clk-rtk-common.c
[ ... ]
> +void rtk_clk_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + const struct rtk_clk_desc *desc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +
> + if (!desc)
> + return;
> +
> + for (int i = 0; i < desc->num_clks; i++)
> + desc->clks[i]->regmap = NULL;
[Severity: High]
Could this clear operation introduce a NULL pointer dereference window?
Since the clocks are registered using devm_clk_hw_register() in
rtk_clk_probe(), they remain active and visible to the Common Clock Framework
until the devres release callbacks execute. This devres cleanup happens
after rtk_clk_remove() returns.
If a consumer or an interrupt invokes a clock operation while the device is
being unbound, the callback might attempt to access the hardware using this
newly cleared NULL regmap pointer.
Because the regmap is obtained via device_node_to_regmap(), which returns a
syscon regmap that is never freed, is it necessary to clear these pointers
during driver unbind?
> +}
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260812020009.3480538-1-eleanor.lin@realtek.com?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-12 2:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-12 1:59 [PATCH v13 00/11] clk / reset: realtek: Add RTD1625 clock and reset support Yu-Chun Lin
2026-08-12 1:59 ` [PATCH v13 01/11] dt-bindings: clock: Add Realtek RTD1625 Clock & Reset Controller Yu-Chun Lin
2026-08-12 2:00 ` [PATCH v13 02/11] reset: Add Realtek basic reset support Yu-Chun Lin
2026-08-12 2:00 ` [PATCH v13 03/11] reset: realtek: Add RTD1625 reset controller driver Yu-Chun Lin
2026-08-12 2:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 2:00 ` [PATCH v13 04/11] clk: realtek: Introduce common probe() and remove() Yu-Chun Lin
2026-08-12 2:08 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-12 2:00 ` [PATCH v13 05/11] clk: realtek: Add support for phase locked loops (PLLs) Yu-Chun Lin
2026-08-12 2:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 2:00 ` [PATCH v13 06/11] clk: realtek: Add support for gate clock Yu-Chun Lin
2026-08-12 2:00 ` [PATCH v13 07/11] clk: realtek: Add support for mux clock Yu-Chun Lin
2026-08-12 2:00 ` [PATCH v13 08/11] clk: realtek: Add support for MMC-tuned PLL clocks Yu-Chun Lin
2026-08-12 2:00 ` [PATCH v13 09/11] clk: realtek: Add RTD1625-CRT clock controller driver Yu-Chun Lin
2026-08-12 2:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 2:00 ` [PATCH v13 10/11] clk: realtek: Add RTD1625-ISO " Yu-Chun Lin
2026-08-12 2:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 2:00 ` [PATCH v13 11/11] arm64: dts: realtek: Add clock support for RTD1625 Yu-Chun Lin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260812020827.D656B1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=eleanor.lin@realtek.com \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.