From: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
To: Hongyan Xu <getshell@seu.edu.cn>
Cc: Support Opensource <support.opensource@diasemi.com>,
mfd@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org, jianhao.xu@seu.edu.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mfd: da903x: cancel IRQ work during teardown
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2026 12:53:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260812115318.GM1072730@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260806152032.894-1-getshell@seu.edu.cn>
On Thu, 06 Aug 2026, Hongyan Xu wrote:
> The IRQ handler disables the IRQ and schedules irq_work. Releasing the
> IRQ does not drain that work, which can continue to use the devm-allocated
> chip and notifier state.
>
> Add a devm action after requesting the IRQ. The action disables the IRQ
> and cancels the work before automatic IRQ release. Run the same action
> before removing child devices on normal detach.
>
> If da903x_add_subdevs() fails, it removes already-created child devices
> before returning from probe. Release the action explicitly before that
> cleanup so the work is stopped before child-device teardown.
>
> This issue was found by the author's in-house static analysis tool.
> The patch was reviewed by the author against the latest mainline tree.
>
> Fixes: 26b8f5e1e2d1 ("mfd: add base support for Dialog DA9030/DA9034 PMICs")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Assisted-by: Codex:GPT-5
> Signed-off-by: Hongyan Xu <getshell@seu.edu.cn>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/da903x.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git "a/drivers/mfd/da903x.c" "b/drivers/mfd/da903x.c"
> index e86b39de3303..f3e983bd21b0 100644
> --- "a/drivers/mfd/da903x.c"
> +++ "b/drivers/mfd/da903x.c"
> @@ -421,6 +421,14 @@ static irqreturn_t da903x_irq_handler(int irq, void *data)
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
>
> +static void da903x_cancel_irq_work(void *data)
> +{
> + struct da903x_chip *chip = data;
> +
> + disable_irq(chip->client->irq);
> + cancel_work_sync(&chip->irq_work);
> +}
> +
> static const struct da903x_chip_ops da903x_ops[] = {
> [0] = {
> .init_chip = da9030_init_chip,
> @@ -484,6 +492,7 @@ static int da903x_add_subdevs(struct da903x_chip *chip,
> return 0;
>
> failed:
> + devm_release_action(chip->dev, da903x_cancel_irq_work, chip);
Manually calling 'devm_release_action' here and in 'da903x_remove' somewhat
defeats the purpose of using managed resources. Should we instead register
the subdevice removal as a devm action as well?
If we register the subdevices' cleanup as a devm action before the IRQ
cancel action, devres will execute them in reverse order during cleanup.
This would allow us to eliminate the '.remove' callback entirely.
> da903x_remove_subdevs(chip);
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -529,6 +538,11 @@ static int da903x_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> return ret;
> }
>
> + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(&client->dev, da903x_cancel_irq_work,
> + chip);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
If we transition to using a devm action for the subdevice removal, we
could call 'da903x_add_subdevs' first, register its cleanup action, and
then register 'da903x_cancel_irq_work'. This would guarantee that the
IRQ work is cancelled before the subdevices are removed during any
unwinding or driver removal.
> return da903x_add_subdevs(chip, pdata);
> }
>
> @@ -536,6 +550,7 @@ static void da903x_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> {
> struct da903x_chip *chip = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>
> + devm_release_action(&client->dev, da903x_cancel_irq_work, chip);
With both cleanup steps handled by devres in the correct order, we should
be able to remove 'da903x_remove' entirely, simplifying the driver.
> da903x_remove_subdevs(chip);
> }
>
> --
> 2.50.1.windows.1
>
--
Lee Jones
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-12 11:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-28 6:55 [PATCH] mfd: da903x: cancel IRQ work during teardown Hongyan Xu
2026-08-06 14:16 ` Lee Jones
2026-08-06 15:20 ` [PATCH v2] " Hongyan Xu
2026-08-12 11:53 ` Lee Jones [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260812115318.GM1072730@google.com \
--to=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=getshell@seu.edu.cn \
--cc=jianhao.xu@seu.edu.cn \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mfd@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=support.opensource@diasemi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.