All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)" <ljs@kernel.org>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, "Oliver Upton" <oupton@kernel.org>,
	"Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: arm64: Fix spurious warning for benign stage 2 teardown race
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2026 13:54:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260812135429.DF04E1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260812-kvm-arm-nested-virt-fix-v1-1-4ad883f1b6a5@kernel.org>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [Critical] Use-After-Free of the dynamically allocated `kvm->arch.nested_mmus` array when the MMU lock is dropped during stage-2 unmap operations.
- [High] NULL Pointer Dereference in `kvm_vcpu_init_nested()` during concurrent VM teardown.
--

--- Patch [1]: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: arm64: Fix spurious warning for benign stage 2 teardown race ---
commit ffda2ec0115c7506d269acccba8c1f4511410e87
Author: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <ljs@kernel.org>

KVM: arm64: Fix spurious warning for benign stage 2 teardown race

This patch suppresses a warning in stage2_apply_range() when the page table
pointer is found to be NULL after reacquiring the MMU lock. It assumes that
the NULL page table is a benign result of a concurrent teardown.

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> index 74e7e7f7564c8..31e049ded0932 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -59,19 +59,25 @@ static phys_addr_t stage2_range_addr_end(phys_addr_t addr, phys_addr_t end)
>   * long will also starve other vCPUs. We have to also make sure that the page
>   * tables are not freed while we released the lock.
>   */
> -static int stage2_apply_range(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu, phys_addr_t addr,
> +static int stage2_apply_range(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu, phys_addr_t start,
>  			      phys_addr_t end,
>  			      int (*fn)(struct kvm_pgtable *, u64, u64),
>  			      bool resched)
>  {
>  	struct kvm *kvm = kvm_s2_mmu_to_kvm(mmu);
> +	phys_addr_t addr = start;
>  	int ret;
>  	u64 next;
>  
>  	do {
>  		struct kvm_pgtable *pgt = mmu->pgt;
> +		/*
> +		 * We may be raced on PGT teardown when we release the
> +		 * kvm->mmu_lock. That's fine as the PGT is legitimately no
> +		 * longer present.
> +		 */
>  		if (!pgt)
> -			return -EINVAL;
> +			return resched && addr > start ? 0 : -EINVAL;

[Severity: Critical]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does suppressing this warning mask a
regression where the mmu pointer itself is used after being freed?

When kvm_nested_s2_unmap() passes an mmu pointer to stage2_apply_range(),
that pointer references a dynamically allocated array:

arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c:kvm_nested_s2_unmap() {
    ...
    struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu = &kvm->arch.nested_mmus[i];
    if (kvm_s2_mmu_valid(mmu))
        kvm_stage2_unmap_range(mmu, ...);
}

If cond_resched_rwlock_write() drops the lock inside stage2_apply_range(),
a concurrent VM teardown or VCPU initialization can completely free this
array:

arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c:kvm_arch_flush_shadow_all() {
    ...
    kvfree(kvm->arch.nested_mmus);
    kvm->arch.nested_mmus = NULL;
}

When the lock is reacquired, the loop continues and accesses mmu->pgt
from the now-freed memory. Is it possible that the warning was actually
firing because we were reading a freed mmu structure?


[Severity: High]
This is also a pre-existing issue, but looking at the concurrent VM teardown
path, does kvm_vcpu_init_nested() have a NULL pointer dereference?

When kvm_vcpu_init_nested() reallocates the array, it unconditionally
updates the mmu pointer for each entry:

arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c:kvm_vcpu_init_nested() {
    ...
    for (int i = 0; i < kvm->arch.nested_mmus_size; i++)
        tmp[i].pgt->mmu = &tmp[i];
    ...
}

If kvm_arch_flush_shadow_all() concurrently calls kvm_free_stage2_pgd()
and sets pgt to NULL before the lock is acquired here, wouldn't this crash
when dereferencing tmp[i].pgt?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260812-kvm-arm-nested-virt-fix-v1-0-4ad883f1b6a5@kernel.org?part=1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-08-12 13:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-12 13:31 [PATCH 0/2] KVM: arm64: Fix spurious warn, null ptr deref on S2 teardown race Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-08-12 13:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: arm64: Fix spurious warning for benign stage 2 " Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-08-12 13:46   ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-08-12 13:54   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-12 13:31 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: arm64: nv: Fix null ptr deref in kvm_nested_s2_unmap() on S2 teardown Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-08-12 14:01   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260812135429.DF04E1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oupton@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.