From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: Biju <biju.das.au@gmail.com>
Cc: wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 7/9] arm64: dts: renesas: r9a08g046: Add USB2.0 function device nodes
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2026 15:56:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260812155631.499EE1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260812141940.246223-8-biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Unprobeable Hardware Dependency causing USB controllers to fail
- [Low] Missing Device Tree Binding Documentation for new compatible string
--
--- Patch [7]: [PATCH v7 7/9] arm64: dts: renesas: r9a08g046: Add USB2.0 function device nodes ---
commit 300a9b2b9e754dfa39a649f78e39731613f70c2b
Author: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>
arm64: dts: renesas: r9a08g046: Add USB2.0 function device nodes
Add USB2.0 function device nodes to the RZ/G3L (r9a08g046) SoC DTSI.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260707145135.247565-3-biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com/
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a08g046.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a08g046.dtsi
> index 2d8c8fd8a01cd..7cf29aed52110 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a08g046.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a08g046.dtsi
> @@ -1105,6 +1105,44 @@ usb2_phy1: usb-phy@11e90200 {
> status = "disabled";
> };
>
> + hsusb0: usb@11e30000 {
> + compatible = "renesas,usbhs-r9a08g046",
> + "renesas,rzg2l-usbhs";
[Severity: Low]
Is the renesas,usbhs-r9a08g046 compatible string documented in the device
tree bindings?
It appears this might cause dtbs_check to fail with a warning since it
is not defined in the valid enumerations within
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/renesas,usbhs.yaml.
> + reg = <0 0x11e30000 0 0x10000>;
> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 123 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> + <GIC_SPI 124 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 125 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <GIC_SPI 122 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + clocks = <&cpg CPG_MOD R9A08G046_USB_PCLK>,
> + <&cpg CPG_MOD R9A08G046_USB_U2P0_EXR_CPUCLK>;
> + resets = <&phyrst 0>,
> + <&cpg R9A08G046_USB_U2P0_EXL_SYSRST>;
> + renesas,buswait = <7>;
> + phys = <&usb2_phy0 3>;
[Severity: High]
Will this create an unresolvable probe deferral?
The renesas_usbhs driver calls phy_get() during probe, depending on
usb2_phy0 here. However, the usb2_phy0 node only specifies
compatible = "renesas,usb2-phy-r9a08g046" without a generic fallback like
"renesas,rzg2l-usb2-phy".
Since the phy-rcar-gen3-usb2.c PHY driver does not match
"renesas,usb2-phy-r9a08g046", the PHY device might not probe, causing
phy_get() to continually return -EPROBE_DEFER.
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260812141940.246223-1-biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com?part=7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-12 15:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-12 14:19 [PATCH v7 0/9] Add RZ/G3L USB2.0 host support Biju
2026-08-12 14:19 ` Biju
2026-08-12 14:19 ` [PATCH v7 1/9] regulator: renesas-usb-vbus-regulator: Rename platform device to rzg2l-vbus-regulator Biju
2026-08-12 14:19 ` [PATCH v7 2/9] dt-bindings: reset: renesas,rzg2l-usbphy-ctrl: Document RZ/G3L support Biju
2026-08-12 14:19 ` [PATCH v7 3/9] reset: rzg2l-usbphy-ctrl: Introduce info struct for match data Biju
2026-08-12 14:19 ` [PATCH v7 4/9] reset: rzg2l-usbphy-ctrl: Add RZ/G3L support Biju
2026-08-12 14:19 ` [PATCH v7 5/9] regulator: renesas-usb-vbus-regulator: Add RZ/G3L VBUS regulator support Biju
2026-08-12 14:19 ` [PATCH v7 6/9] arm64: dts: renesas: r9a08g046: Add USB2.0 host/phy device nodes Biju
2026-08-12 15:44 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 14:19 ` [PATCH v7 7/9] arm64: dts: renesas: r9a08g046: Add USB2.0 function " Biju
2026-08-12 15:56 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-12 14:19 ` [PATCH v7 8/9] arm64: dts: renesas: r9a08g046l48-smarc: Add USB2.0 Host support Biju
2026-08-12 16:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 14:19 ` [PATCH v7 9/9] arm64: dts: renesas: r9a08g046l48-smarc: Enable USB2.0 function support Biju
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260812155631.499EE1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=biju.das.au@gmail.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.