From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Anthony Krowiak" <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.vom>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 8/9] s390/vfio-ap: Fix NULL deref in status_show() during queue probe
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2026 20:22:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260812202217.ED50B1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260812200240.818004-9-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Missing synchronization for asynchronous reset work during device removal leads to Use-After-Free.
--
--- Patch [8]: [PATCH v5 8/9] s390/vfio-ap: Fix NULL deref in status_show() during queue probe ---
commit 0bb399a6ce7f9a2aea3f2f595acfac62183158ba
Author: Anthony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
s390/vfio-ap: Fix NULL deref in status_show() during queue probe
This commit fixes a null pointer dereference in status_show() by checking
if the driver data has been set before proceeding. It also adjusts lock
acquisition during queue probe and simplifies the apqn assignment.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> index 16779cfc64e87..1edd0b7a3cce7 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -2472,8 +2492,13 @@ int vfio_ap_mdev_probe_queue(struct ap_device *apdev)
> return ret;
>
> err_remove_group:
> + release_update_locks_for_mdev(matrix_mdev);
> sysfs_remove_group(&apdev->device.kobj, &vfio_queue_attr_group);
> return ret;
> +
> +err_release_locks:
> + release_update_locks_for_mdev(matrix_mdev);
> + return ret;
> }
>
> void vfio_ap_mdev_remove_queue(struct ap_device *apdev)
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but looking at the rest of
vfio_ap_mdev_remove_queue() below this signature, is there a potential
use-after-free if the queue is removed from the host config?
Further down in vfio_ap_mdev_remove_queue():
if (test_bit_inv(apid, (unsigned long *)matrix_dev->info.apm) &&
test_bit_inv(apqi, (unsigned long *)matrix_dev->info.aqm)) {
vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queue(q);
flush_work(&q->reset_work);
} else {
vfio_ap_free_aqic_resources(q);
}
done:
if (matrix_mdev)
vfio_ap_unlink_queue_fr_mdev(q);
dev_set_drvdata(&apdev->device, NULL);
kfree(q);
If an administrator hot-unplugs the ap adapter concurrently with a guest
triggering a reset, the queue is no longer in the host's configuration.
Because flush_work(&q->reset_work) is inside the conditional block, it is
skipped in this scenario. The function then proceeds directly to kfree(q).
Could the asynchronous reset worker thread (apq_reset_check) then execute
and dereference the freed q object, resulting in a use-after-free?
Should flush_work(&q->reset_work) be moved outside the condition to ensure
any pending reset work completes before the queue memory is freed?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260812200240.818004-1-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com?part=8
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-12 20:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-12 20:02 [PATCH v5 0/9] s390/vfio-ap: Fix bugs in vfio_ap device driver callback functions Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-12 20:02 ` [PATCH v5 1/9] s390/vfio-ap: Fix stale do_remove flag across iterations in vfio_ap_mdev_cfg_remove Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-12 20:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 20:02 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] s390/vfio-ap: Fix dereference matrix_mdev->kvm without checking for NULL Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-12 20:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 20:02 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] s390/vfio-ap: Fix missing lock required to access list of ap_matrix_mdev objects Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-12 20:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 20:02 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] s390/vfio-ap: Fix required lock not held during update of ap_matrix_mdev object Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-12 20:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 20:02 ` [PATCH v5 5/9] s390/vfio-ap: Fix control domain removal in vfio_ap_mdev_cfg_remove Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-12 20:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 20:02 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] s390/vfio-ap: fix potential use of uninitialized apm_filtered bitmap Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-12 20:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 20:02 ` [PATCH v5 7/9] s390/vfio-ap: Fix hot-unplug skipped when last AP adapter or domain removed Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-12 20:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 20:02 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] s390/vfio-ap: Fix NULL deref in status_show() during queue probe Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-12 20:22 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-12 20:54 ` Matthew Rosato
2026-08-12 20:02 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] s390/vfio-ap: Fix memory leak when queue removed from host AP config Anthony Krowiak
2026-08-12 20:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-12 21:12 ` Matthew Rosato
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260812202217.ED50B1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.vom \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.