All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Cc: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>, damon@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] mm/damon/reclaim: remove unnecessary damon_call() param validation
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2026 21:11:41 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260813041142.98270-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260813040141.2A72A1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>

On Thu, 13 Aug 2026 04:01:40 +0000 sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:

> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
> 
> Pre-existing issues:
> - [High] Concurrent invocation of `damon_call()` during kthread startup leads to an infinite kernel loop.
> --
> 
> --- Patch [3]: [RFC PATCH 3/4] mm/damon/reclaim: remove unnecessary damon_call() param validation ---
> commit 07f6c5438f6069b0b8225e26e3726d6aa4e3da09
> Author: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>
> 
> mm/damon/reclaim: remove unnecessary damon_call() param validation
> 
> DAMON_RECLAIM avoids passing NULL or unstarted damon_ctx to damon_call()
> with its own validation. The validation is no longer needed, because
> the DAMON core layer now handles the corner cases itself. Remove the
> unnecessary check.
> 
> > diff --git a/mm/damon/reclaim.c b/mm/damon/reclaim.c
> > index 45d5557cc575a..42a2c9cb13431 100644
> > --- a/mm/damon/reclaim.c
> > +++ b/mm/damon/reclaim.c
> [ ... ]
> > @@ -293,10 +291,6 @@ static int damon_reclaim_commit_inputs_store(const char *val,
> >  	if (!commit_inputs_request)
> >  		return 0;
> >  
> > -	/* Skip damon_call() if ctx has not successfully started. */
> > -	if (!damon_reclaim_damon_has_started)
> > -		return -EINVAL;
> > -
> 
> [Severity: High]
> This is a pre-existing issue, but does removing this validation expose an
> infinite loop in the DAMON core?
> 
> If userspace writes to this sysfs file concurrently with damon_start(),
> damon_call() in mm/damon/core.c can hit a race condition. The core
> initializes ctx->call_controls_obsolete to true. If damon_call() runs
> before the kthread fully starts, it can read call_controls_obsolete == true
> and jump to the canceled label:
> 
> mm/damon/core.c:damon_call() {
>     ...
>     if (ctx->call_controls_obsolete) {
>         mutex_unlock(&ctx->call_controls_lock);
>         goto canceled;
>     }
>     ...
> canceled:
>     while (damon_is_running(ctx))
>         schedule_timeout_idle(msecs_to_jiffies(100));
>     return -ECANCELED;
> }
> 
> If damon_start() concurrently sets ctx->kdamond to non-NULL,
> damon_is_running(ctx) becomes true. Because the kthread has just started,
> it runs indefinitely, and damon_call() gets trapped in the while loop
> forever.

Because of the param_lock, that race is impossible.

> 
> >  	err = damon_call(ctx, &control);
> >  
> >  	return err ? err : control.return_code;
> 
> -- 
> Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260813035001.97364-1-sj@kernel.org?part=3


Thanks,
SJ

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-13  4:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-13  3:49 [RFC PATCH 0/4] mm/damon: allow NULL or unstarted damon_ctx parameter for damon_call() SJ Park
2026-08-13  3:49 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] mm/damon/core: handle NULL ctx parameter in damon_call() SJ Park
2026-08-13  3:58   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-13  8:33   ` Gutierrez Asier
2026-08-13  3:49 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] mm/damon/core: set ctx->call_controls_obsolete in damon_new_ctx() SJ Park
2026-08-13  4:02   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-13  4:10     ` SJ Park
2026-08-13  3:49 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] mm/damon/reclaim: remove unnecessary damon_call() param validation SJ Park
2026-08-13  4:01   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-13  4:11     ` SJ Park [this message]
2026-08-13  3:49 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] mm/damon/lru_sort: " SJ Park
2026-08-13  4:04   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-13  4:12     ` SJ Park

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260813041142.98270-1-sj@kernel.org \
    --to=sj@kernel.org \
    --cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.