All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: phucduc.bui@gmail.com
Cc: neil.armstrong@linaro.org, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] mmc: davinci: Handle optional IRQ return value correctly
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2026 05:45:00 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260813054501.3F5B41F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260813053404.21553-4-phucduc.bui@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 4 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Hardware clock is disabled before devm-managed IRQ handlers are unregistered, creating a window for fatal unclocked register accesses.
- [High] The probe function overwrites `pdev->id_entry` with `NULL` for legacy devices, breaking hardware version detection.
- [High] The device's memory region name points to a dynamically allocated string that is freed prior to the region itself during teardown.
- [High] Failure to check the `dma_map_sg` return value leads to an invalid `dma_unmap_sg` call during PIO fallback.
--

--- Patch [3]: [PATCH v2 3/3] mmc: davinci: Handle optional IRQ return value correctly ---
commit 27e81af9e24b190ffa17b59c0cbac338793c903c
Author: bui duc phuc <phucduc.bui@gmail.com>

mmc: davinci: Handle optional IRQ return value correctly

host->sdio_irq is assigned from platform_get_irq_optional(), which
returns a positive IRQ number on success or a negative error code on
failure. Therefore, 0 is not a possible return value from this API.

Check for a positive IRQ number before requesting the SDIO IRQ instead
of treating zero as a valid IRQ.

Signed-off-by: bui duc phuc <phucduc.bui@gmail.com>

> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/davinci_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/davinci_mmc.c
> index 773577a105124..c503e5f5c8865 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/davinci_mmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/davinci_mmc.c
> @@ -1303,7 +1303,7 @@ static int davinci_mmcsd_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (ret)
>  		goto mmc_add_host_fail;
>  
> -	if (host->sdio_irq >= 0) {
> +	if (host->sdio_irq > 0) {
>  		ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, host->sdio_irq,
>  				       mmc_davinci_sdio_irq, 0,
>  				       mmc_hostname(mmc), host);

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does the error handling in probe and the
remove function create a window where unclocked register accesses can occur?

In the probe error path and the remove function, the hardware clock is
disabled before the devres-managed IRQ handlers are unregistered:

drivers/mmc/host/davinci_mmc.c:davinci_mmcsd_probe() {
    ...
dma_probe_defer:
    clk_disable_unprepare(host->clk);
    return ret;
}

Since the IRQ is managed by devm_request_irq(), it remains active while the
clock is explicitly disabled. Could an interrupt fire during this window and
cause a synchronous external abort when the handler reads unclocked registers?

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does the probe function break
hardware version detection for legacy non-OF devices?

The probe function unconditionally overwrites the platform device's id_entry:

drivers/mmc/host/davinci_mmc.c:davinci_mmcsd_probe() {
    ...
    pdev->id_entry = device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
    ...
}

If the device is instantiated via legacy platform data rather than device
tree, device_get_match_data() will return NULL. This overwrites the
previously valid pdev->id_entry, which corrupts subsequent
platform_get_device_id() lookups later in the probe sequence.

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but could the memory region rename cause a
use-after-free during device teardown?

In the probe function, the memory region's name is set to a dynamically
allocated string from the mmc host:

drivers/mmc/host/davinci_mmc.c:davinci_mmcsd_probe() {
    ...
    rename_region(mem, mmc_hostname(mmc));
    ...
}

During teardown in davinci_mmcsd_remove(), devres executes in reverse order.
The MMC host (which contains the mmc_hostname string) will be freed before
the devres-managed memory region is released. If /proc/iomem is read during
this window, would it dereference a dangling pointer?

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but could a failure in DMA mapping
lead to an invalid unmap call later?

In mmc_davinci_start_dma_transfer(), the return value of dma_map_sg() is not
checked for failure (which returns 0):

drivers/mmc/host/davinci_mmc.c:mmc_davinci_start_dma_transfer() {
    ...
    host->sg_len = dma_map_sg(mmc_dev(host->mmc), data->sg, data->sg_len,
                              mmc_get_dma_dir(data));
    ...
    host->do_dma = 1;
    ...
}

If dma_map_sg() fails and returns 0, host->do_dma is still set to 1. This
engages the PIO fallback but retains the DMA state, potentially causing
invalid dma_unmap_sg() calls when the transfer completes.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260813053404.21553-1-phucduc.bui@gmail.com?part=3

_______________________________________________
linux-amlogic mailing list
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic

      reply	other threads:[~2026-08-13  5:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-13  5:34 [PATCH v2 0/3] mmc: Handle errors from optional IRQ lookup phucduc.bui
2026-08-13  5:34 ` phucduc.bui
2026-08-13  5:34 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] mmc: meson-gx: " phucduc.bui
2026-08-13  5:34   ` phucduc.bui
2026-08-13  5:34 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] mmc: davinci: " phucduc.bui
2026-08-13  5:34   ` phucduc.bui
2026-08-13  5:34 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] mmc: davinci: Handle optional IRQ return value correctly phucduc.bui
2026-08-13  5:34   ` phucduc.bui
2026-08-13  5:45   ` sashiko-bot [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260813054501.3F5B41F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
    --cc=phucduc.bui@gmail.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.