From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F773330301; Thu, 13 Aug 2026 23:08:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786662485; cv=none; b=iu5suQcAvrEK7D09Td0GyxpGae0kHa3Lj4W1NifjGdTRzdpKLi5NKykNv1sBRBL/bAskwmRzN+VvcA6Ap0NsIYMaw9uRtgju9W0NHS9dKwmaEHAoKfxMTuXROBzKGu6pnTVXzC7KtRYrVTp9U52IX+vaM5B7e0RG7mUhBrLlKzk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786662485; c=relaxed/simple; bh=/WDdnGUJXBqqZqovujSnoIXubkHCv+sfY0h4Mw7+dtg=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=qw1xUyPmyKM7aWTGT4Wrbl5haOb9+dlYA9qELQU+ek/I9kX0W0jFwAv3j4XE5G9aXviMLHQEU68lEkCLSPzEnv1gdtDw7D6yi8mqy9AY/4WIW3YJ7y9uU5iyiH9OBTNeLkKF7AAyBGrUeI+jY+u0Sy8Y0ZIOoH6hMbTEiv1JRVU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ly8NUml/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ly8NUml/" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 68AD31F000E9; Thu, 13 Aug 2026 23:08:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1786662483; bh=/WDdnGUJXBqqZqovujSnoIXubkHCv+sfY0h4Mw7+dtg=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=ly8NUml/qxbwzwPGb4I5ii/dBr4Xn1Qr+3DmYx/5Oq7vtBF95nk0j49JmTssUT2yP 5Fyyr7E5g+R9q5oG+aCPiJ2u6d5CAegEbkFWb7yPqfIw8GhgBwmuvlhTfTiWZzZVDH HBHuOpNM3yheAmFbCVIcfud5ovhZHCuSyXG9/oSrfAUrMQxJxkD56B7vgc3E2a0lEr c3ZdzGSN5glir+UYkTsuHMoP2IQgxd00h2jvc3/TZKqW8nkhFPVMWzRt0VrpkLw2yG PE0ZYh0Wmod1T/xwhbjqCDeSb/fmblCBhqZLoIZhn1iRuUPy4jpzA6qyW/tPGgYysQ 78BhjLMT8jHIw== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 9/9] KVM: s390: Fix KVM_S390_VCPU_FAULT ioctl Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Claudio Imbrenda" Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Alexander Gordeev" , "Christian Borntraeger" , "Heiko Carstens" , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Vasily Gorbik" In-Reply-To: <20260324174301.232921-10-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com> References: <20260324174301.232921-10-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2026 23:08:02 +0000 Message-Id: <20260813230803.68AD31F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > A previous commit changed the behaviour of the KVM_S390_VCPU_FAULT > ioctl. The current (wrong) implementation will trigger a guest > addressing exception if the requested address lies outside of a > memslot, unless the VM is UCONTROL. >=20 > Restore the previous behaviour by open coding the fault-in logic. >=20 > Fixes: 3762e905ec2e ("KVM: s390: use __kvm_faultin_pfn()") > Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260324174301.2329= 21-1-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com?part=3D9