From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] selftest/bpf: make pyperf600 a success again
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2026 16:29:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260813232943.581283-1-andrii@kernel.org> (raw)
pyperf600 has been running into 8K BPF_COMPLEXITY_LIMIT_JMP_SEQ limitations
for a long while now, after some internal compiler changes.
Until BPF verifier is bestowed with scalar evolution logic, make that test
actually work by doing what would anyone should do in such situations: by
moving repeatable per-iteration work into independently verified global
functions.
`void *` argument is a problem for global funcs, but a static function wrapper
doing necessary casts and a bit of __arg_nonnull magic dust is all it takes.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/pyperf.h | 12 ++++++++++--
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/pyperf.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/pyperf.h
index 86484f07e1d1..fd93a96e5901 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/pyperf.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/pyperf.h
@@ -85,9 +85,11 @@ static void *get_thread_state(void *tls_base, PidData *pidData)
return thread_state;
}
-static __always_inline bool get_frame_data(void *frame_ptr, PidData *pidData,
- FrameData *frame, Symbol *symbol)
+__weak bool __get_frame_data(long frame_ptr_, PidData *pidData __arg_nonnull,
+ FrameData *frame __arg_nonnull, Symbol *symbol __arg_nonnull)
{
+ void *frame_ptr = (void *)frame_ptr_;
+
// read data from PyFrameObject
bpf_probe_read_user(&frame->f_back,
sizeof(frame->f_back),
@@ -119,6 +121,12 @@ static __always_inline bool get_frame_data(void *frame_ptr, PidData *pidData,
return true;
}
+static __always_inline bool get_frame_data(void *frame_ptr, PidData *pidData,
+ FrameData *frame, Symbol *symbol)
+{
+ return __get_frame_data((long)frame_ptr, pidData, frame, symbol);
+}
+
struct {
__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH);
__uint(max_entries, 1);
--
2.53.0-Meta
next reply other threads:[~2026-08-13 23:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-13 23:29 Andrii Nakryiko [this message]
2026-08-14 0:21 ` [PATCH bpf-next] selftest/bpf: make pyperf600 a success again bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-14 4:19 ` Yonghong Song
2026-08-14 6:41 ` Pu Lehui
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260813232943.581283-1-andrii@kernel.org \
--to=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.