From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Alan Maguire" <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 1/2] libbpf: Allow use of feature cache for non-token cases
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2026 23:50:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260813235010.BB8F71F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260408105324.663280-2-alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] `bpf_object_prepare_token` unconditionally overwrites `obj->feat_cache` if BPF tokens are supported, leaking any custom cache set by `bpf_object_set_feat_cache` and causing test mocking to be environment-dependent.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 1/2] libbpf: Allow use of feature cache for non-token cases ---
commit 118614ae13eed03565933d30357d27d00e3145b4
Author: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
libbpf: Allow use of feature cache for non-token cases
This patch exposes a new internal API, bpf_object_set_feat_cache(),
allowing BPF selftests to assign a custom feature cache to a bpf_object.
This enables simulating missing kernel features to test BTF sanitization
fallback paths.
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> index 42bdba4efd0c6..b7b636786d387 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -5203,12 +5203,20 @@ bool kernel_supports(const struct bpf_object *obj, enum kern_feature_id feat_id)
> */
> return true;
>
> - if (obj->token_fd)
> + if (obj->feat_cache)
> return feat_supported(obj->feat_cache, feat_id);
>
> return feat_supported(NULL, feat_id);
> }
>
> +/* Used in testing to simulate missing features. */
> +void bpf_object_set_feat_cache(struct bpf_object *obj, struct kern_feature_cache *cache)
> +{
> + if (obj->feat_cache)
> + zfree(&obj->feat_cache);
> + obj->feat_cache = cache;
> +}
> +
[Severity: Medium]
If a test sets a custom cache using this function and then loads the object,
could bpf_object_prepare_token() overwrite and leak this custom cache if BPF
token creation succeeds?
Looking at bpf_object_prepare_token(), it unconditionally allocates a new
cache when token creation is successful:
tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c:bpf_object_prepare_token() {
...
obj->feat_cache = calloc(1, sizeof(*obj->feat_cache));
if (!obj->feat_cache) {
close(token_fd);
return -ENOMEM;
}
...
}
Would this cause testing environments to behave non-deterministically?
It seems tests might successfully preserve the mock cache on systems without
token delegation (where bpf_token_create fails and returns early), but lose
the mocked state and leak the initially injected cache on systems with token
support.
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260408105324.663280-1-alan.maguire@oracle.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-13 23:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-08 10:53 [PATCH v2 bpf-next 0/2] selftests/bpf: Test BTF sanitization Alan Maguire
2026-04-08 10:53 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 1/2] libbpf: Allow use of feature cache for non-token cases Alan Maguire
2026-04-08 13:37 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-08-13 23:50 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-04-08 10:53 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add BTF sanitize test covering BTF layout Alan Maguire
2026-04-08 12:53 ` Chengkaitao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260813235010.BB8F71F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=alan.maguire@oracle.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.