From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 012482C9D for ; Fri, 14 Aug 2026 00:59:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786669160; cv=none; b=kZxi3EtEZkUztg4chh3Ajk/XTLGMAnFohJbR2otRqSJU9rl0/0vVxMKA3Y+QLD2x22Eih9ekhzBi9pAIAZZCOCD42YKyGIv7Q5tSpzb5UEL+qq3DXim55e/5TUwJ5fbeW2eBljJBe7j21PNLH/dTqCy2IoYfVGPB9d7NN+dfN8I= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786669160; c=relaxed/simple; bh=lyXAfRPPwr7kO9YQcZNC3VDbt036+AvhCGbSjDggtTI=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=RJ/a84taJgw5d1iSzq2wL/cyrRL0cJQiDem+PzifgWeTuyapFO34CVtSv4trk/waYeJeGYe1/x99v9bvH4X8Cf4sBeHRRUVJD2iJKsEUMEJmSOY532p8qAuAD9ioxXWci86H5me+dS892bLC9Gl3sMs+CGVPpfibb1X7DbyM41g= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=XIvhwFE9; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="XIvhwFE9" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 35F811F000E9; Fri, 14 Aug 2026 00:59:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1786669158; bh=lyXAfRPPwr7kO9YQcZNC3VDbt036+AvhCGbSjDggtTI=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=XIvhwFE9Xy608NPiMCS6lXsXgUWvimPRhqpjSJREGHdEc6CXGNoQc6ARS+zRqugcl 1HWCwF6OhmPTRzIwJSsQgle9ydMPvq2etKICWCc4CwnXrOAdj9f4Xss6LHLmHkdXTz oRIKheNcVPTqoBttKsQgN60JTT5oCdvOydYu43QAFuIZUf1KQ9blxmpcy/AEajVlX6 OiHaZUs5APXSOrKLVSfQERZ7Rk/G91nVoMkAQ91G5yqr4xKzUFm6y/oj+C5jF6lH8p ZtxIvFaIps4bc+hZcUtmLdA/7o0jKPUO/1KvY6Gs+OXVIqlQ6FTH7zIU+3wlDjRBJ5 OlnLCvvCdxnvA== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 15/33] perf kwork: Don't pass evsel with sample Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Ian Rogers" Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20260413041143.1736055-16-irogers@google.com> References: <20260413041143.1736055-16-irogers@google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2026 00:59:12 +0000 Message-Id: <20260814005918.35F811F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > The sample contains the evsel and so it is unnecessary to pass the > evsel as well. Remove the evsel from struct kwork_class. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260413041143.1736= 055-1-irogers@google.com?part=3D15