From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Antoni Pokusinski" <apokusinski01@gmail.com>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org,
"Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/9] rtc: abx80x: add mutex protection for register writes
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2026 01:20:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260814012024.6678E1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260810193826.210683-4-apokusinski01@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Incomplete locking leaves configuration key sequences vulnerable to disruption by concurrent read operations.
--
--- Patch [3]: [PATCH v4 3/9] rtc: abx80x: add mutex protection for register writes ---
commit 45525a43d1a439e6b8a50fcba7c541c85b598f5c
Author: Antoni Pokusinski <apokusinski01@gmail.com>
rtc: abx80x: add mutex protection for register writes
The ABX80X RTC driver performs multi-step register operations such as
NVMEM transfers or register writes preceded by a configuration key write.
This patch adds a mutex to serialize register writes and protect these
sequences against race conditions.
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-abx80x.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-abx80x.c
> index fdf9664ebb6f0..0c8d3416fd5a9 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-abx80x.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-abx80x.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -234,6 +237,8 @@ static int abx80x_rtc_set_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
> buf[ABX8XX_REG_YR] = bin2bcd(tm->tm_year - 100);
> buf[ABX8XX_REG_WD] = tm->tm_wday;
>
> + guard(mutex)(&priv->lock);
> +
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but since this patch introduces the mutex to
protect multi-step sequences, should the read paths also acquire the lock?
According to the ABX80X hardware specification, the configuration key is
automatically cleared by any subsequent register read or write.
If a sysfs attribute write like oscillator_store() acquires the lock and
writes the configuration key, but another process concurrently calls an
unprotected read path like abx80x_rtc_read_time() or abx80x_read_alarm():
abx80x_rtc_read_time()
err = i2c_smbus_read_i2c_block_data(client, ABX8XX_REG_HTH, ...);
Could this interleaved I2C read silently clear the configuration key before
the protected write completes, causing the hardware configuration update to
fail?
> err = i2c_smbus_write_i2c_block_data(client, ABX8XX_REG_HTH,
> sizeof(buf), buf);
> if (err < 0) {
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260810193826.210683-1-apokusinski01@gmail.com?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-14 1:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-10 19:38 [PATCH v4 0/9] rtc: abx80x: add support for abx81x Antoni Pokusinski
2026-08-10 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] dt-bindings: rtc: abx80x: document ABX81X RTCs Antoni Pokusinski
2026-08-14 0:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-10 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] rtc: abx80x: fix error check after i2c_smbus_read in read_alarm() Antoni Pokusinski
2026-08-14 1:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-10 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] rtc: abx80x: add mutex protection for register writes Antoni Pokusinski
2026-08-14 1:20 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-10 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] rtc: abx80x: properly handle shared IRQs Antoni Pokusinski
2026-08-14 1:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-10 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] rtc: abx80x: add irq to struct abx80x_priv Antoni Pokusinski
2026-08-14 1:44 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-10 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] rtc: abx80x: use regmap instead of I2C specific API Antoni Pokusinski
2026-08-14 1:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-10 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] rtc: abx80x: replace read-modify-write pattern with regmap helpers Antoni Pokusinski
2026-08-14 2:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-10 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] rtc: abx80x: create abx80x_i2c_probe() Antoni Pokusinski
2026-08-14 2:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-10 19:38 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] rtc: abx80x: add support for ABX81X Antoni Pokusinski
2026-08-14 2:31 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260814012024.6678E1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=apokusinski01@gmail.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.