From: Ridong Chen <ridong.chen@linux.dev>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>,
David Finkel <davidf@vimeo.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org (open list:CONTROL GROUP - MEMORY
RESOURCE CONTROLLER (MEMCG)),
linux-mm@kvack.org (open list:CONTROL GROUP - MEMORY RESOURCE
CONTROLLER (MEMCG)),
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tao Cui <cuitao@kylinos.cn>,
Ridong Chen <ridong.chen@linux.dev>,
Ridong Chen <chenridong@xiaomi.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/2] mm, memcg: fix memory.peak reset clobbering other fds' watermark
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2026 11:30:03 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260814033005.2481920-1-ridong.chen@linux.dev> (raw)
From: Ridong Chen <chenridong@xiaomi.com>
The memory.peak / memory.swap.peak per-fd watermark tracking has two
issues. Each open fd is a watcher and reads back max(its own value, the
shared local_watermark); both bugs live in that scheme.
Worst case for both is the same and is userspace-visible: a reader of
memory.peak (or memory.swap.peak) gets a value lower than the true peak,
so a tool that sizes or bills a cgroup by its peak usage under-reports it.
Patch 1 (read side) fixes the race Sashiko pointed out in the v1 review
[1]: peak_show() inspects local_watermark and the per-fd values without
holding peaks_lock, so a reader that races an unrelated peak_write()
reset briefly observes the lowered value. Transient. It takes peaks_lock
in the show path.
Patch 2 (write side) fixes peak_write(): on a reset it stores the
current usage into the other watchers instead of the old watermark, so
once usage has dropped from a peak a reset on one fd drags every other
fd's peak down too, even fds that never reset.
---
Changes since v3:
- Switch to guard(spinlock) in the peak readers, suggested by Muchun.
Changes since v2:
- Spell out the worst-case userspace-visible effect, per Andrew's
Go back to v1 [2].
Changes since v1:
- New patch 1: hold peaks_lock in the peak readers (Sashiko).
- Patch 2: floor the peers with max(usage, local_watermark), mirroring
peak_show(), and skip the writing fd (Johannes Weiner).
[1] https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260730115314.1069089-1-ridong.chen@linux.dev?part=1
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260730115314.1069089-1-ridong.chen@linux.dev/
Ridong Chen (2):
memcg: acquire peaks_lock when reading memory.peak
mm, memcg: fix memory.peak reset clobbering other fds' watermark
mm/memcontrol.c | 9 ++++++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2026-08-14 3:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-14 3:30 Ridong Chen [this message]
2026-08-14 3:30 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] memcg: acquire peaks_lock when reading memory.peak Ridong Chen
2026-08-14 3:42 ` Muchun Song
2026-08-14 3:30 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] mm, memcg: fix memory.peak reset clobbering other fds' watermark Ridong Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260814033005.2481920-1-ridong.chen@linux.dev \
--to=ridong.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chenridong@xiaomi.com \
--cc=cuitao@kylinos.cn \
--cc=davidf@vimeo.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=muchun.song@linux.dev \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.