All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Golla Nagendra" <nagendra.golla@amd.com>
Cc: vkoul@kernel.org, Frank.Li@kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 6/8] dmaengine: zynqmp_dma: Use of_dma_is_coherent for dma-coherent
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2026 05:10:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260814051050.B685F1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260814045616.1661199-7-nagendra.golla@amd.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Missing hardware context restore on system resume leads to DMA data corruption.
- [High] DMA descriptor structures lack explicit little-endian types, breaking on big-endian kernels.
--

--- Patch [6]: [PATCH V2 6/8] dmaengine: zynqmp_dma: Use of_dma_is_coherent for dma-coherent ---
commit 85ed10a27c3d9299f4dbcb91c70a55052ad9638d
Author: Golla Nagendra <nagendra.golla@amd.com>

dmaengine: zynqmp_dma: Use of_dma_is_coherent for dma-coherent

Use of_dma_is_coherent() instead of parsing the common dma-coherent
device-tree property directly.

> diff --git a/drivers/dma/xilinx/zynqmp_dma.c b/drivers/dma/xilinx/zynqmp_dma.c
> index 5e81e0d950e8f..194abfd6cb25d 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/xilinx/zynqmp_dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/xilinx/zynqmp_dma.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -947,7 +948,7 @@ static int zynqmp_dma_chan_probe(struct zynqmp_dma_device *zdev,
>  	if (match_data)
>  		chan->irq_offset = match_data->offset;
>  
> -	chan->is_dmacoherent =  of_property_read_bool(node, "dma-coherent");
> +	chan->is_dmacoherent = of_dma_is_coherent(node);

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does the system resume path fail to
restore the DMA hardware register context?

A system suspend-to-RAM cycle causes the PM domain to power off, which
wipes the DMA register context. Upon resume, zynqmp_dma_resume() calls
pm_runtime_force_resume():

drivers/dma/xilinx/zynqmp_dma.c:zynqmp_dma_resume() {
    ...
    if (!device_may_wakeup(dev))
        return pm_runtime_force_resume(dev);
    ...
}

This re-enables clocks but doesn't call zynqmp_dma_init() to restore
critical registers like ZYNQMP_DMA_DSCR_ATTR and ZYNQMP_DMA_DATA_ATTR.

Will subsequent DMA transfers proceed with non-coherent hardware defaults
and silently bypass CPU cache snooping?


[Severity: High]
This is also a pre-existing issue, but are the hardware descriptor fields
missing explicit little-endian types?

The hardware descriptor layout uses native C types instead of __le32 and
__le64:

struct zynqmp_dma_desc_ll {
    u64 addr;
    u32 size;
    u32 ctrl;
    u64 nxtdscraddr;
    u64 rsvd;
};

When the driver is built on a big-endian architecture (like ARM64 with
CPU_BIG_ENDIAN), the native assignments in zynqmp_dma_config_sg_ll_desc()
will store values in big-endian format:

drivers/dma/xilinx/zynqmp_dma.c:zynqmp_dma_config_sg_ll_desc() {
    ...
    sdesc->size = ddesc->size = len;
    sdesc->addr = src;
    ddesc->addr = dst;
    ...
}

Could the little-endian ZynqMP DMA hardware misinterpret these swapped
sizes and addresses, leading to corrupted DMA transfers and memory corruption?

>  	zdev->chan = chan;
>  	tasklet_setup(&chan->tasklet, zynqmp_dma_do_tasklet);
>  	spin_lock_init(&chan->lock);

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260814045616.1661199-1-nagendra.golla@amd.com?part=6

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-14  5:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-14  4:56 [PATCH V2 0/8] dmaengine: zynqmp_dma: Fix error paths and follow-up cleanups Golla Nagendra
2026-08-14  4:56 ` [PATCH V2 1/8] dmaengine: zynqmp_dma: Fix PM rollback on sw_desc_pool alloc failure Golla Nagendra
2026-08-14  5:13   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14  4:56 ` [PATCH V2 2/8] dmaengine: zynqmp_dma: Free sw_desc_pool on desc_pool_v " Golla Nagendra
2026-08-14  5:14   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14  4:56 ` [PATCH V2 3/8] dmaengine: zynqmp_dma: Fix chan probe/remove error handling Golla Nagendra
2026-08-14  4:56 ` [PATCH V2 4/8] dmaengine: zynqmp_dma: Fix stale kerneldoc comments Golla Nagendra
2026-08-14  5:12   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14  4:56 ` [PATCH V2 5/8] dmaengine: zynqmp_dma: Fix minor whitespace Golla Nagendra
2026-08-14  4:56 ` [PATCH V2 6/8] dmaengine: zynqmp_dma: Use of_dma_is_coherent for dma-coherent Golla Nagendra
2026-08-14  5:10   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-14  4:56 ` [PATCH V2 7/8] dmaengine: zynqmp_dma: Reject zero-length memcpy transfers Golla Nagendra
2026-08-14  4:56 ` [PATCH V2 8/8] dmaengine: zynqmp_dma: Remove unused define and duplicate IRQ bit Golla Nagendra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260814051050.B685F1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
    --cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nagendra.golla@amd.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.