All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Zhang Yi" <yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v5 06/32] ext4: recheck extent status tree before block allocation
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2026 10:15:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260814101548.7E86E1F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260814093331.1703882-7-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Reading uninitialized `map->m_seq` on error paths leads to an infinite retry loop in `ext4_map_blocks()`, causing a kernel hard lockup.
--

--- Patch [6]: [PATCH -next v5 06/32] ext4: recheck extent status tree before block allocation ---
commit 6ae9b515f2027351280fce82734e7e8361a281e7
Author: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>

ext4: recheck extent status tree before block allocation

After acquiring i_data_sem in write mode, recheck that the mapping
found via the extent status tree or disk query has not changed. If
we find a valid extent and the sequence number has changed, retry
the entire lookup to obtain the correct trimmed mapping.

> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> index 9dbece14ae569..548a3968c5a7d 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -820,6 +821,19 @@ int ext4_map_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
>  	 * with create == 1 flag.
>  	 */
>  	down_write(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Check the validity of the mapping found via the extent status
> +	 * tree or the disk query. A racing truncate may have changed the
> +	 * extent, since writeback does not hold i_rwsem or the folio locks
> +	 * covering the full extent.
> +	 */
> +	if (map->m_seq != READ_ONCE(EXT4_I(inode)->i_es_seq)) {
> +		up_write(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem);
> +		map->m_flags = 0;
> +		map->m_len = orig_mlen;
> +		goto create_retry;
> +	}

[Severity: High]
Could this cause an infinite loop and hard lockup on disk error?

If ext4_map_query_blocks() encounters an error like -EIO or -EFSCORRUPTED,
it returns < 0 without setting map->m_seq.

However, if EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CREATE is set, the function does not return
early on error and falls through to this TOCTOU check.

Since callers like _ext4_get_block() allocate struct ext4_map_blocks
on the stack:

fs/ext4/inode.c:_ext4_get_block() {
        struct ext4_map_blocks map;
        ...
        map.m_lblk = iblock;
        map.m_len = bh->b_size >> inode->i_blkbits;

        ret = ext4_map_blocks(..., &map, flags);
}

Will map->m_seq contain uninitialized stack garbage, causing the sequence
check to mismatch and jump to create_retry, which then encounters the exact
same disk error indefinitely?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260814093331.1703882-1-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com?part=6

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-14 10:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-14  9:32 [PATCH -next v5 00/32] ext4: use iomap for regular file's buffered I/O path Zhang Yi
2026-08-14  9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 01/32] ext4: simplify size updating in ext4_setattr() Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:02   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14  9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 02/32] ext4: factor out ext4_truncate_[up|down]() Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:04   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14  9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 03/32] ext4: simplify error handling in ext4_setattr() Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:12   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14  9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 04/32] ext4: skip ordered I/O wait when zeroing beyond i_disksize block Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:14   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14  9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 05/32] ext4: set EXT4_MAP_NEW flag for delayed allocated blocks Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:08   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14  9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 06/32] ext4: recheck extent status tree before block allocation Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:15   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-14  9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 07/32] ext4: fix orig_mlen initialization in ext4_map_blocks() Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:08   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14  9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 08/32] ext4: allow ext4_map_blocks() to start its own transaction handle Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:00   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14  9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 09/32] ext4: avoid unnecessary transaction in ext4_map_blocks() for unwritten extents Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:15   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14  9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 10/32] ext4: skip block allocation for holes in the data submission path Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:15   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14  9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 11/32] ext4: add iomap address space operations for buffered I/O Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:04   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14  9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 12/32] ext4: implement buffered read path using iomap Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:15   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14  9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 13/32] ext4: pass out extent seq counter when mapping da blocks Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:12   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14  9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 14/32] ext4: do not use data=ordered mode for inodes using buffered iomap path Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:12   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14  9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 15/32] ext4: implement buffered write path using iomap Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:40   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14  9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 16/32] ext4: implement writeback " Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:19   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14  9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 17/32] ext4: implement mmap " Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:35   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14  9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 18/32] ext4: implement partial block zero range " Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:25   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14  9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 19/32] ext4: tolerate unexpected holes in ext4_convert_unwritten_extents() Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:09   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14  9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 20/32] ext4: add block mapping tracepoints for iomap buffered I/O path Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:08   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14  9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 21/32] ext4: disable online defrag when inode using " Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:08   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14  9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 22/32] ext4: add EXT4_STATE_DISKSIZE_GROW_PENDING state bit and helpers Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:09   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14  9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 23/32] ext4: submit and wait for pending disksize-grow I/O on writeback Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:25   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14  9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 24/32] ext4: advance i_disksize to i_size upon disksize-grow I/O completion Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:25   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14  9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 25/32] ext4: defer i_disksize update while DISKSIZE_GROW_PENDING is set Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:31   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14  9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 26/32] ext4: submit and wait for disksize-grow I/O in fallocate paths Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14  9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 27/32] ext4: clear DISKSIZE_GROW_PENDING on truncate or error Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:31   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14  9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 28/32] ext4: set DISKSIZE_GROW_PENDING after zeroing unaligned EOF block Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:18   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14  9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 29/32] ext4: add tracepoints for DISKSIZE_GROW_PENDING set, clear, and wait Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:18   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14  9:33 ` [PATCH -next v5 30/32] ext4: add tracepoints for EOF block zeroing and disksize-grow I/O Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:19   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14  9:46 ` [PATCH -next v5 31/32] ext4: partially enable iomap for the buffered I/O path of regular files Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:39   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14  9:46 ` [PATCH -next v5 32/32] ext4: introduce a mount option for iomap buffered I/O path Zhang Yi
2026-08-14 10:25   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260814101548.7E86E1F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.