From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0E7B42E8C2; Fri, 14 Aug 2026 10:58:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786705112; cv=none; b=QHmFzn1ov2GV1y2NWtVZgeC0NTMxl5ysY5Hkz1Ye3acepu7dexBFO3iGCTzztWyM8H7ucKa7hVQKof4MPbkPm6+ETcTcGSCL7D6Nz+3akczvkEswM7iualM/LUYcY2oYIqa30TKbU12GYWQIxDJ+IwKlsqB8VKoNIIkNV7kPvEo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786705112; c=relaxed/simple; bh=BdxzVRD/tDun2kP6MUbSQj3CDSwRIZo56NRnuBBaiyk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=aOS5bxkdPurNvxovmNKZF+OIRUH0DPrxbng2Sp0Winf6XMk5woaRuqBbVJJ3m/EolRgdfB9ffSGAnNLld0h8jKrLNPT3p/XijNVxuJjPyflSYg9q2fNImoxtrwb67uU9hJIbCfdOA2+VSnXjvo9Uoiw5W2Vq4J1b28f8pQKiZSA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=JCx409qU; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=E+NDhCHA; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="JCx409qU"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="E+NDhCHA" Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2026 12:58:12 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1786705094; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=atGYebWIHE6oJfRsylhUJ221uYmQeT6OPEvxObbJ4Js=; b=JCx409qUc4TZnP4BifPsWHonw8TCRztTWKPkWLOr5ccLtxePdpKOaPqQqbx4cnYeUjj68x 94NJCjE9PTI4EHdCqac6mbUSXkFs96JsXc3j0gIipW7wx5NntG2HEsluK0ZL3V2ppQv8Pm LFgAzClqgxMDgHtXZGSxlbAP6at9iNGkZINXnKmj8L2lTU7sch42Hzgm2eIp3q4MpoYU3C V4fAOBbUES4eIkVyRvxKV/AEgb0IhOjoYXlvbDWA2JlsD2K3PudbmIuB+/EdC6iA/3RR44 rrMzrppWIc3TuyQTjYj6e3bFXSVOmjyS+3VQgV1Bs09FOb2wGTkxJESMthfDjQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1786705094; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=atGYebWIHE6oJfRsylhUJ221uYmQeT6OPEvxObbJ4Js=; b=E+NDhCHAQaah8KQpLl8NuiSMsidjr65Y2S44xwHVtztR3fKFEBnaXvpY0BAJaxXn/RbsAk 65xzPTmd7vEHSCCg== From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: linux-atm-general@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-can@vger.kernel.org, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, kuniyu@google.com, mkl@pengutronix.de, marcelo.leitner@gmail.com, ncardwell@google.com, socketcan@hartkopp.net, pabeni@redhat.com, courmisch@gmail.com, horms@kernel.org, steffen.klassert@secunet.com, willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, lucien.xin@gmail.com, pmladek@suse.com, thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de, kees@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3] net: Replace %pK output with 0 Message-ID: <20260814105812.mwsdgu5m@linutronix.de> References: <20260812110531.ITPqiY2O@linutronix.de> <20260814015800.2837019-2-kuba@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-can@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260814015800.2837019-2-kuba@kernel.org> On 2026-08-13 18:58:01 [-0700], Jakub Kicinski wrote: > Hi Sebastian! Hi Jakub, > We have upgraded the slop...itifier since v2, it has more comments now... > The one about %ps potentially leaking more rather than less looks legit? It complains about %ps leaking the pointer if kallsym is switched off. This isn't unique to can and I pointed this out to Kees. Oliver Hartkopp mentioned that he wanted to rework the can output. I'm going to tell vsprintf to route the %ps output the same as %p for !kallsym so this goes away. Depending on what you prefer we can keep it as it or I drop the can bits and repost everything else as-it. And then address later the other sashiko bits where the documentation mentions "location of socket in memory". Sebastian