All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
	Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>,
	Quentin Monnet <qmo@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 5/5] selftests/bpf: Improve readability in iter test for percpu data
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2026 01:32:06 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260814173206.93082-6-leon.hwang@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260814173206.93082-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev>

The original 'offsetof()' + offset is equal to the new 'offsetof()'. Use
the new 'offsetof()' instead.

Rename two variables btw:

* offsetof_num -> num_off
* percpu_data_sum -> sum

Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/global_data_init.c   | 6 +++---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_global_percpu_data.c | 6 +++---
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/global_data_init.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/global_data_init.c
index 2f0dbeb88934..c6d055b9457d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/global_data_init.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/global_data_init.c
@@ -348,8 +348,8 @@ static void test_global_percpu_data_iter(void)
 		return;
 
 	skel->rodata->num_cpus = num_cpus;
-	skel->rodata->offsetof_num = offsetof(struct test_global_percpu_data__percpu, struct_data);
-	skel->rodata->offsetof_num += sizeof(skel->percpu->struct_data) - sizeof(int);
+	skel->rodata->num_off = offsetof(struct test_global_percpu_data__percpu,
+					 struct_data.nums[6]);
 	skel->rodata->elem_sz = roundup(sizeof(struct test_global_percpu_data__percpu), 8);
 	skel->percpu->struct_data.nums[6] = 0xc0de;
 
@@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ static void test_global_percpu_data_iter(void)
 		do { } while (0);
 	ASSERT_EQ(len, 0, "read iter");
 	ASSERT_TRUE(skel->bss->run_iter, "run_iter");
-	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->percpu_data_sum, 0xc0de * num_cpus, "percpu_data_sum");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->sum, 0xc0de * num_cpus, "sum");
 
 	close(fd);
 out:
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_global_percpu_data.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_global_percpu_data.c
index 12556590b647..175c44000753 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_global_percpu_data.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_global_percpu_data.c
@@ -64,9 +64,9 @@ int verifier_snprintf(void *ctx)
 }
 
 volatile const __u32 num_cpus = 0;
-volatile const int offsetof_num;
+volatile const int num_off;
 volatile const int elem_sz;
-__u32 percpu_data_sum = 0;
+__u32 sum = 0;
 bool run_iter = false;
 
 SEC("iter/bpf_map_elem")
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ int dump_percpu_data(struct bpf_iter__bpf_map_elem *ctx)
 	run_iter = true;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < num_cpus; i++) {
-		percpu_data_sum += *(int *) (pptr + offsetof_num);
+		sum += *(int *) (pptr + num_off);
 		pptr += elem_sz;
 	}
 	return 0;
-- 
2.55.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-08-14 17:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-14 17:32 [PATCH bpf-next 0/5] bpf: Followups for global percpu data series Leon Hwang
2026-08-14 17:32 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/5] bpf: Drop duplicate blank line in verifier Leon Hwang
2026-08-14 20:32   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-08-14 17:32 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/5] libbpf: Avoid unnecessary mmap resize for percpu data maps Leon Hwang
2026-08-14 17:32 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/5] bpftool: Update comments about skel " Leon Hwang
2026-08-14 20:32   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-08-14 17:32 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/5] selftests/bpf: Avoid flaky resize value test for percpu data Leon Hwang
2026-08-14 18:24   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-14 17:32 ` Leon Hwang [this message]
2026-08-14 20:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next 0/5] bpf: Followups for global percpu data series Andrii Nakryiko
2026-08-14 20:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260814173206.93082-6-leon.hwang@linux.dev \
    --to=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
    --cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=qmo@kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.