All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: sched-ext@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched_ext: Drop unlocked scx_rq_clock_invalidate() from scx_root_disable()
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2026 06:03:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260815060357.51C101F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260815055107.115671-2-tj@kernel.org>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but `SCX_RQ_CLK_VALID` can be permanently stranded as 1 during `scx_root_disable()`, causing the next SCX scheduler to read a massively outdated clock via `scx_bpf_now()`.
--

--- Patch [1]: [PATCH 1/2] sched_ext: Drop unlocked scx_rq_clock_invalidate() from scx_root_disable() ---
commit c8d4a8f1095e17e1c662f243f67711302652b61f
Author: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

sched_ext: Drop unlocked scx_rq_clock_invalidate() from scx_root_disable()

This commit drops the unlocked scx_rq_clock_invalidate() call during
scx_root_disable(), relying instead on the rq lock cycle and unlock
path to clear the clock valid flags.

> diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
> index 18183062f751c..40c9467d8b186 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
> @@ -6162,12 +6162,13 @@ static void scx_root_disable(struct scx_sched *sch)
>  	percpu_up_write(&scx_fork_rwsem);
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * Invalidate all the rq clocks to prevent getting outdated
> -	 * rq clocks from a previous scx scheduler.
> +	 * Re-balance the dl_server bandwidth reservations: detach ext_server
> +	 * (no more sched_ext tasks) and reinstate fair_server if it was
> +	 * previously detached because we were running in full mode.
>  	 *
> -	 * Also re-balance the dl_server bandwidth reservations: detach
> -	 * ext_server (no more sched_ext tasks) and reinstate fair_server if it
> -	 * was previously detached because we were running in full mode.
> +	 * The rq lock cycle also invalidates each rq's clock (rq_unpin_lock()
> +	 * clears SCX_RQ_CLK_VALID on unlock), preventing the next enable from
> +	 * seeing outdated rq clocks from this scheduler.

[Severity: High]
This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but is it possible for the
SCX_RQ_CLK_VALID flag to be permanently stranded as 1 during
scx_root_disable()?

The commit message and comment note that rq_unpin_lock() clears the flag
on unlock, and __scx_enabled is turned off later. However, if a concurrent
CPU takes the rq lock after the cycle but before __scx_enabled is disabled,
it seems a race can occur:

CPU N (Normal scheduling):
Takes rq lock
update_rq_clock() sets SCX_RQ_CLK_VALID (since __scx_enabled is still true)

CPU 0 (scx_root_disable):
static_branch_disable(&__scx_enabled);

CPU N (Normal scheduling):
Releases rq lock -> rq_unpin_lock() -> scx_rq_clock_invalidate()
scx_rq_clock_invalidate() in kernel/sched/sched.h checks:
    if (!scx_enabled())
        return;

Because scx_enabled() now evaluates to false, the function returns early and
fails to clear SCX_RQ_CLK_VALID.

When a new BPF scheduler is loaded later, early hooks like ops.select_cpu
that run without holding the rq lock might call scx_bpf_now() and see
SCX_RQ_CLK_VALID == 1. Will this cause them to use a massively outdated
clock from the previous scheduler's run?

>  	 *
>  	 * Unlike the enable path, this runs on a recovery path that cannot
>  	 * fail, so we use dl_server_swap_bw() to atomically free ext_server's
> @@ -6180,8 +6181,6 @@ static void scx_root_disable(struct scx_sched *sch)
>  	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>  		struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
>  
> -		scx_rq_clock_invalidate(rq);
> -
>  		scoped_guard(rq_lock_irqsave, rq) {
>  			update_rq_clock(rq);
>  			if (was_switched_all) {

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260815055107.115671-1-tj@kernel.org?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-15  6:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-15  5:51 [PATCHSET sched_ext/for-7.3] sched_ext: Misc fixes Tejun Heo
2026-08-15  5:51 ` [PATCH 1/2] sched_ext: Drop unlocked scx_rq_clock_invalidate() from scx_root_disable() Tejun Heo
2026-08-15  6:03   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-15  5:51 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched_ext: Make scx_bpf_events() read the calling scheduler's counters Tejun Heo
2026-08-15  6:04   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260815060357.51C101F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.