From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Harald Freudenberger" <freude@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] s390/crypto: Fix missing scrub of temp buffers with PAES algorithm
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2026 10:52:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260817105244.599641F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260817104203.74033-3-freude@linux.ibm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [Medium] Missing memory scrub on stack temporary bounce buffer in `ctr_aes_crypt()`.
- [Medium] Missing memory scrub on stack bounce buffers in `gcm_aes_crypt()`.
--
--- Patch [2]: [PATCH v2 2/6] s390/crypto: Fix missing scrub of temp buffers with PAES algorithm ---
commit 517f415eda900d45f7871a3da2f51b851e06642f
Author: Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>
s390/crypto: Fix missing scrub of temp buffers with PAES algorithm
This patch explicitly scrubs the stack bounce buffer used for partial block
processing in ctr_paes_do_crypt(). It also updates __xts_2keys_prep_param()
to scrub the entire pcc_param structure rather than just the key field,
preventing inadvertent exposure of sensitive cryptographic material.
> diff --git a/arch/s390/crypto/paes_s390.c b/arch/s390/crypto/paes_s390.c
> index ccc7da106c3a0..d075b0241f1f5 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/crypto/paes_s390.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/crypto/paes_s390.c
> @@ -1044,6 +1044,7 @@ static int ctr_paes_do_crypt(struct s390_paes_ctx *ctx,
> }
>
> out:
> + memzero_explicit(buf, sizeof(buf));
[Severity: Medium]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does ctr_aes_crypt() in
arch/s390/crypto/aes_s390.c have the same missing scrub on its temporary
bounce buffer?
Like the PAES algorithm fixed here, intermediate cryptographic data
appears to be left on the kernel stack when an AES-CTR operation
processes a final partial block that is not a multiple of AES_BLOCK_SIZE:
arch/s390/crypto/aes_s390.c:ctr_aes_crypt() {
...
if (nbytes) {
memset(buf, 0, AES_BLOCK_SIZE);
memcpy(buf, walk.src.virt.addr, nbytes);
cpacf_kmctr(sctx->fc, sctx->key, buf, buf,
AES_BLOCK_SIZE, walk.iv);
memcpy(walk.dst.virt.addr, buf, nbytes);
crypto_inc(walk.iv, AES_BLOCK_SIZE);
ret = skcipher_walk_done(&walk, 0);
}
return ret;
}
> pr_debug("rc=%d\n", rc);
> return rc;
> }
> @@ -1377,7 +1378,7 @@ static inline int __xts_2keys_prep_param(struct s390_pxts_ctx *ctx,
> memcpy(param->init, pcc_param.xts, 16);
> }
>
> - memzero_explicit(pcc_param.key, sizeof(pcc_param.key));
> + memzero_explicit(&pcc_param, sizeof(pcc_param));
[Severity: Medium]
This is also a pre-existing issue, but does gcm_aes_crypt() in
arch/s390/crypto/aes_s390.c also need its stack bounce buffers scrubbed?
It explicitly scrubs the param structure, but seems to omit scrubbing
gw_in and gw_out. This leaves intermediate cryptographic data on the stack
when an AES-GCM operation with scattered or unaligned data uses the internal
bounce buffers:
arch/s390/crypto/aes_s390.c:gcm_aes_crypt() {
...
struct gcm_sg_walk gw_in, gw_out;
...
memzero_explicit(¶m, sizeof(param));
return ret;
}
> return rc;
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260817104203.74033-1-freude@linux.ibm.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-17 10:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-17 10:41 [PATCH v2 0/6] Fixes and rework for paes_s390 Harald Freudenberger
2026-08-17 10:41 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] s390/crypto: Fix return code handling at skcipher_walk_done in PAES algorithms Harald Freudenberger
2026-08-17 11:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-17 10:41 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] s390/crypto: Fix missing scrub of temp buffers with PAES algorithm Harald Freudenberger
2026-08-17 10:52 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-17 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] s390/crypto: Fix use of mutex in atomic context in PAES Harald Freudenberger
2026-08-17 10:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-17 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] s390/crypto: Fix missing cra_flags in paes_s390 Harald Freudenberger
2026-08-17 10:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-17 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] s390/crypto: Fix handling of EBUSY in PAES when req is pushed to crypto engine Harald Freudenberger
2026-08-17 10:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-17 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] s390/crypto: Fix handling of EBUSY in PHMAC " Harald Freudenberger
2026-08-17 10:56 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260817105244.599641F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=freude@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.