From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 238F5360ED0; Tue, 18 Aug 2026 15:04:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787065474; cv=none; b=GzefIyVmIO8dAI9VYmhlV9PLLKNC9ndukq3a5he/pXXW9jII92t2jfsse11LKicGyIwQ8VNdqRtOO+3JEPK2f/knFy1Zh3qs/kUmhnq7tTptm33h+1cMyLqzuvcwRJTGqgYC4NH80WzNVXmWPWuhSb7ADPO+VFf6vjjvNqFSwX0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787065474; c=relaxed/simple; bh=nESoZrukwvdusVjl+4KsQrv0lHfbMnduPKxqpsNRT2A=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=eKu5oUfV4DYNP0gnrX58aCR28cBvAQPg7v+mi9ikVzfipNR7yy7QrODlnzi4Qagu2o9Cq7HIB2IDxDsDaFhQJPqRO4Sq2bPY+zH8fiyj3u0ZVJbASM6XgJ9q99zAsda0dctlh33/MEjy/uPEliHTTrxAVnIu7WbR/X7hP8hL4to= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=hHQNKrTq; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="hHQNKrTq" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 46CBC1F000E9; Tue, 18 Aug 2026 15:04:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1787065472; bh=KcjhzJ7sOPArtWHGdq8QdkbhhdfNGoMxsfYX7Yzs1lI=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=hHQNKrTqJUx6GlzHcK4SWnZRaj4ll4FhMBbb9j/dMjqay3+Fa+Py29glLEyH5/ERJ coVD0CssN8KrLLJT15pKAqFPwcCEGXssdIdVznlQLrN+39H8+GoQ6x73tggQ77L6pV VAI8ulor7LnwCUKuI65DhkUXOEeX5BoUTYhd9ZQbsjZX8McVW+o5Fk/5yFMyNRsGn6 WyPGVyNEruCU+m1fkZC80wxqlsQCJ/OlJU7X3lyzosg+vdvoKkZR+beryitoaHUmMn qc63cmJIS7X7AyG4YKXXalj+3rRVzO/BYYiXJRqDig0GWeKSpWOeGVkyLvz502p3Nd MgC/CXc0KhwMw== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 20/25] unwind_user/eh_frame/x86: Enable eh_frame unwinding on x86 Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Jens Remus" Cc: "Vasily Gorbik" , "Christian Borntraeger" , linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Heiko Carstens" , "Alexander Gordeev" , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20260818144954.2320378-21-jremus@linux.ibm.com> References: <20260818144954.2320378-1-jremus@linux.ibm.com> <20260818144954.2320378-21-jremus@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2026 15:04:31 +0000 Message-Id: <20260818150432.46CBC1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > The x86-64 .eh_frame implementation works well with GCC and Clang > generated code. Enable it. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Jens Remus Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260818144954.2320= 378-1-jremus@linux.ibm.com?part=3D20