From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jens Remus" <jremus@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 22/25] unwind_user/eh_frame/x86: Handle DRAP expressions
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2026 15:10:47 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260818151047.92B1C1F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260818144954.2320378-23-jremus@linux.ibm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Inner DRAP frames fail to unwind due to `state->topmost` restriction on `UNWIND_USER_RULE_REG_OFFSET_DEREF`.
--
--- Patch [22]: [RFC PATCH v1 22/25] unwind_user/eh_frame/x86: Handle DRAP expressions ---
commit a2eefb14435ba994b91a768aaf44090977190c84
Author: Jens Remus <jremus@linux.ibm.com>
unwind_user/eh_frame/x86: Handle DRAP expressions
GCC uses DRAP (Dynamic Realign Argument Pointer) when the stack needs
to be dynamically realigned. This patch adds x86-specific handling for
the CFA and FP DWARF expressions patterns used to describe how to unwind
through such frames.
> diff --git a/kernel/unwind/eh_frame.c b/kernel/unwind/eh_frame.c
> index 19e2bc96ddbc2..49e8a3e8d794a 100644
> --- a/kernel/unwind/eh_frame.c
> +++ b/kernel/unwind/eh_frame.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1206,6 +1231,16 @@ static __always_inline int __find_frame_row(struct eh_frame_section *sec,
> frame->fp.regnum = ctx.state.reg_regnum[FP_IDX];
> frame->fp.offset = 0;
> break;
> + case REG_REGISTER_OFFSET_DEREF:
> + if (ctx.state.reg_regnum[FP_IDX] > UINT_MAX)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + if (ctx.state.reg_offset[FP_IDX] < INT_MIN ||
> + ctx.state.reg_offset[FP_IDX] > INT_MAX)
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + frame->fp.rule = UNWIND_USER_RULE_REG_OFFSET_DEREF;
[Severity: High]
Will this rule cause unwinding to fail for inner stack frames?
When an inner stack frame requires DRAP evaluation, the unwinder evaluates
UNWIND_USER_RULE_REG_OFFSET_DEREF in kernel/unwind/user.c:unwind_user_next_common()
like this:
if (!state->topmost || unwind_user_get_reg(&fp, frame->fp.regnum))
return -EINVAL;
Since inner frames are not topmost, this check will return -EINVAL and
abort the unwinding process. Could this truncate backtraces that pass
through dynamically realigned stack frames?
> + frame->fp.regnum = ctx.state.reg_regnum[FP_IDX];
> + frame->fp.offset = ctx.state.reg_offset[FP_IDX];
> + break;
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260818144954.2320378-1-jremus@linux.ibm.com?part=22
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-18 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-18 14:49 [RFC PATCH v1 00/25] unwind_user: Implement .eh_frame handling Jens Remus
2026-08-18 14:49 ` [RFC PATCH v1 01/25] unwind_user: Add generic and arch-specific headers to MAINTAINERS Jens Remus
2026-08-18 14:49 ` [RFC PATCH v1 02/25] unwind_user: Stop when reaching an outermost frame Jens Remus
2026-08-18 14:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-18 14:49 ` [RFC PATCH v1 03/25] unwind_user: Enable archs that pass RA in a register Jens Remus
2026-08-18 14:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-18 14:49 ` [RFC PATCH v1 04/25] unwind_user: Flexible FP/RA recovery rules Jens Remus
2026-08-18 14:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-18 14:49 ` [RFC PATCH v1 05/25] unwind_user: Flexible CFA " Jens Remus
2026-08-18 14:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-18 14:49 ` [RFC PATCH v1 06/25] unwind_user: Enable archs that define CFA = SP_callsite + offset Jens Remus
2026-08-18 14:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-18 14:49 ` [RFC PATCH v1 07/25] unwind_user/eh_frame: Add support for reading .eh_frame_hdr section Jens Remus
2026-08-18 15:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-18 14:49 ` [RFC PATCH v1 08/25] unwind_user/eh_frame: Store .eh_frame_hdr section data in per-mm maple tree Jens Remus
2026-08-18 15:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-18 14:49 ` [RFC PATCH v1 09/25] unwind_user/eh_frame: Add support for reading .eh_frame section Jens Remus
2026-08-18 15:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-18 14:49 ` [RFC PATCH v1 10/25] unwind_user/eh_frame: Detect .eh_frame_hdr sections in executables Jens Remus
2026-08-18 15:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-18 14:49 ` [RFC PATCH v1 11/25] unwind_user/eh_frame: Wire up unwind_user to eh_frame Jens Remus
2026-08-18 15:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-18 14:49 ` [RFC PATCH v1 12/25] unwind_user/eh_frame: Remove .eh_frame[_hdr] section on detected corruption Jens Remus
2026-08-18 15:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-18 14:49 ` [RFC PATCH v1 13/25] unwind_user/eh_frame: Show file name in debug output Jens Remus
2026-08-18 15:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-18 14:49 ` [RFC PATCH v1 14/25] unwind_user/eh_frame: Add .eh_frame[_hdr] validation option Jens Remus
2026-08-18 15:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-18 14:49 ` [RFC PATCH v1 15/25] unwind_user/eh_frame: Duplicate registered .eh_frame[_hdr] section data on clone/fork Jens Remus
2026-08-18 15:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-18 14:49 ` [RFC PATCH v1 16/25] unwind_user/eh_frame: Add linear .eh_frame search fallback Jens Remus
2026-08-18 15:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-18 14:49 ` [RFC PATCH v1 17/25] unwind_user/eh_frame: Ignore DW_CFA_GNU_args_size Jens Remus
2026-08-18 15:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-18 14:49 ` [RFC PATCH v1 18/25] unwind_user/eh_frame: Add support for DWARF expressions Jens Remus
2026-08-18 15:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-18 14:49 ` [RFC PATCH v1 19/25] x86/uaccess: Add unsafe_copy_from_user() implementation Jens Remus
2026-08-18 15:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-18 14:49 ` [RFC PATCH v1 20/25] unwind_user/eh_frame/x86: Enable eh_frame unwinding on x86 Jens Remus
2026-08-18 15:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-18 14:49 ` [RFC PATCH v1 21/25] unwind_user/eh_frame/x86: Handle PLT expressions Jens Remus
2026-08-18 15:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-18 14:49 ` [RFC PATCH v1 22/25] unwind_user/eh_frame/x86: Handle DRAP expressions Jens Remus
2026-08-18 15:10 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-18 14:49 ` [RFC PATCH v1 23/25] s390/ptrace: Provide frame_pointer() Jens Remus
2026-08-18 15:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-18 14:49 ` [RFC PATCH v1 24/25] unwind_user/eh_frame/s390: Enable eh_frame unwinding on s390 Jens Remus
2026-08-18 15:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-18 14:49 ` [RFC PATCH v1 25/25] unwind_user/eh_frame: Add prctl() interface for (un)registering .eh_frame_hdr sections Jens Remus
2026-08-18 15:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-18 17:21 ` [RFC PATCH v1 00/25] unwind_user: Implement .eh_frame handling Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260818151047.92B1C1F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jremus@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.