From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3DD045199C; Tue, 18 Aug 2026 15:15:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787066116; cv=none; b=XQBYL8PWgDRSaa6WmfJHrHIV46P1MmKRT6XO1Rc1s5OzrEgf988+ySy5YM9XxtQy9ZgjGaF0f3fSebVkh5P/34cfNV2LQKXX/rx+5T/du0gHF+8VCJPct6qSSGfYNVzPcR2bMcXp05x7yNvfGQQpyrPwNjQqLL42Go0mMnTVcBA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787066116; c=relaxed/simple; bh=e2WGGdt0kKL2QKkuVMu/LK7tRgKArkAanaLGv1fHYVI=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=IsWmnTy4REikLsZLGfTNDqlHvvAf3Da6rs+qZGePkZPWj/wZo+C7HpyMTY/WIh6Ak4yVeFQGcxND5P5ZLihJqQnFTwCxtsHu+Z1WlijwK/91fAlVfJfuz3Jp9CJlz5sBUoKMaw6P/LcCdMKkGoed4FCxSzE/Lor2ND4V+V/PXww= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=NjLRL/rn; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="NjLRL/rn" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3A44C1F000E9; Tue, 18 Aug 2026 15:15:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1787066115; bh=nZr9AGBXD2VFVJb3kjDcfPHWbHdidC14pH40Uwxha4s=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=NjLRL/rnF9dNxtn/1Qt7pOw8yIy5lemMDp8X1nEq4txdMzrag7g8Yc9OUj4iJrHW1 3pBz6dn45btIPVMJA8vczm6tXIkXW6HNBG+XxMoVcdEwWwC5YK+FAbEd5tAJUJTBdv WNSqxiYGK3cHlaiB1V+SjZnQ6iLznouakC29wktUxwi0DQQRrXwX1cIYxbglXLnHF5 C1Wi6KPN8nLNNRrLk9hESv8u7RkNg/fa8PnZ51uLvJD++FXo+C0G7O9D6flRrva17l FK650/kicYz9Ix3t1nbeHVYJ7Tx8AGc98PqVuXdS1qs9sKxD7veHoMTitSydQQme/i 5U9HWK0TizzAw== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 24/25] unwind_user/eh_frame/s390: Enable eh_frame unwinding on s390 Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Jens Remus" Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Heiko Carstens" , "Alexander Gordeev" , "Christian Borntraeger" , linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Vasily Gorbik" In-Reply-To: <20260818144954.2320378-25-jremus@linux.ibm.com> References: <20260818144954.2320378-1-jremus@linux.ibm.com> <20260818144954.2320378-25-jremus@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2026 15:15:14 +0000 Message-Id: <20260818151515.3A44C1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > The unwind user eh_frame implementation works well with GCC and Clang > generated code on s390. Enable it. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Jens Remus Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260818144954.2320= 378-1-jremus@linux.ibm.com?part=3D24