All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Abdifatah Suruur" <suruurism@gmail.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfio/platform: prevent read-only region mappings from becoming writable
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2026 08:53:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260819085318.740D81F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260819083940.1374-1-suruurism@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [Critical] The patch addresses CVE-2026-68445 for vfio/platform by preventing read-only mappings from being upgraded to writable, but identically vulnerable code remains in vfio/cdx and vfio/fsl-mc.
- [High] Concurrent calls to vfio_platform_read_mmio() or vfio_platform_write_mmio() on an unmapped region can leak ioremap allocations due to unprotected lazy initialization.
--

--- Patch [1]: [PATCH] vfio/platform: prevent read-only region mappings from becoming writable ---
commit 229b89b6deb9e0fe81d355a6a2b3effcd15a2dd9
Author: Abdifatah Suruur <suruurism@gmail.com>

vfio/platform: prevent read-only region mappings from becoming writable
    
This commit prevents userspace from using mprotect() to upgrade read-only
VFIO platform region mappings to writable. It achieves this by clearing the
VM_MAYWRITE flag for regions that lack the VFIO_REGION_INFO_FLAG_WRITE flag.

> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c
> index c72db5a99ebda..20d87c244ca28 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_common.c
> @@ -595,6 +595,10 @@ int vfio_platform_mmap(struct vfio_device *core_vdev, struct vm_area_struct *vma
>  			&& (vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> +	/* Prevent read-only region mappings from being upgraded with mprotect() */
> +	if (!(vdev->regions[index].flags & VFIO_REGION_INFO_FLAG_WRITE))
> +		vm_flags_clear(vma, VM_MAYWRITE);
> +

[Severity: Critical]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this same missing check exist in other
VFIO drivers? Looking at vfio_cdx_mmap() in drivers/vfio/cdx/main.c:

	if (!(vdev->regions[index].flags & VFIO_REGION_INFO_FLAG_WRITE) &&
	    (vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE))
		return -EPERM;

	return vfio_cdx_mmap_mmio(vdev->regions[index], vma);

And similarly in vfio_fsl_mc_mmap() in drivers/vfio/fsl-mc/vfio_fsl_mc.c:

	if (!(vdev->regions[index].flags & VFIO_REGION_INFO_FLAG_WRITE)
			&& (vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE))
		return -EINVAL;

	vma->vm_private_data = mc_dev;

Are these mappings also susceptible to being upgraded to writable using
mprotect() because VM_MAYWRITE is not cleared?

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but while reviewing
vfio_platform_common.c, could concurrent accesses leak ioremap allocations? 

In vfio_platform_read_mmio() and vfio_platform_write_mmio():

	if (!reg->ioaddr) {
		reg->ioaddr =
			ioremap(reg->addr, reg->size);

		if (!reg->ioaddr)
			return -ENOMEM;
	}

If two threads concurrently execute pread() or pwrite() on the same unmapped
region, could both observe !reg->ioaddr as true and independently call
ioremap(), resulting in the slower thread overwriting reg->ioaddr and
leaking the mapped memory?

>  	vma->vm_private_data = vdev;
>  
>  	if (vdev->regions[index].type & VFIO_PLATFORM_REGION_TYPE_MMIO)
>  		return vfio_platform_mmap_mmio(vdev->regions[index], vma);

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260819083940.1374-1-suruurism@gmail.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-19  8:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-19  8:39 [PATCH] vfio/platform: prevent read-only region mappings from becoming writable Abdifatah Suruur
2026-08-19  8:53 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-08-19  8:41 Abdifatah Suruur

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260819085318.740D81F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=suruurism@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.