All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <yi1.lai@intel.com>
To: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
Cc: oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, lkp@intel.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	x86@kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	yi1.lai@intel.com
Subject: [linus:master] [x86/bugs]  a3af84b0fa: stress-ng.seccomp.ops_per_sec 95.7% regression
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2026 14:20:52 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202608191340.98574fe2-lkp@intel.com> (raw)


Hello,

kernel test robot noticed a 95.7% regression of stress-ng.seccomp.ops_per_sec on:

commit: a3af84b0fa00ead01fcd0e28b5d773ff25990a0d ("x86/bugs: Enable IBPB flush on BPF JIT allocation")
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master

testcase: stress-ng
config: x86_64-rhel-9.4
compiler: gcc-14
test machine: 256 threads 2 sockets Intel(R) Xeon(R) 6768P  CPU @ 2.4GHz (Granite Rapids) with 64G memory
parameters:

	nr_threads: 100%
	testtime: 60s
	test: seccomp
	cpufreq_governor: performance

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <yi1.lai@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202608191340.98574fe2-lkp@intel.com


Details are as below:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->


The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at:
https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260819/202608191340.98574fe2-lkp@intel.com

=========================================================================================
compiler/cpufreq_governor/kconfig/nr_threads/rootfs/tbox_group/test/testcase/testtime:
  gcc-14/performance/x86_64-rhel-9.4/100%/debian-13-x86_64-20250902.cgz/lkp-gnr-2sp4/seccomp/stress-ng/60s

commit: 
  96cce16e26 ("bpf: Support for hardening against JIT spraying")
  a3af84b0fa ("x86/bugs: Enable IBPB flush on BPF JIT allocation")
  b72e29e0f7 (bpf: Prefer dirty packs for eBPF allocations)

96cce16e26dd02a8 a3af84b0fa00ead01fcd0e28b5d b72e29e0f7ee329d89f86db8700
---------------- --------------------------- ---------------------------
         %stddev     %change         %stddev     %change         %stddev
             \          |                \          |                \
    351130           -95.7%      15233           -92.8%      25169        stress-ng.seccomp.ops
      5866           -95.7%     252.80           -92.9%     418.07        stress-ng.seccomp.ops_per_sec
    403577           -92.1%      31710           -88.5%      46510        stress-ng.time.involuntary_context_switches
  34288719 ±  2%     -95.4%    1594121           -92.5%    2566499        stress-ng.time.minor_page_faults
      4244           -67.9%       1363 ±  2%     -71.9%       1193        stress-ng.time.percent_of_cpu_this_job_got
      2515           -67.1%     826.95 ±  2%     -71.3%     721.20        stress-ng.time.system_time
     41.17 ±  2%     -94.9%       2.10 ±  3%     -91.7%       3.40 ±  2%  stress-ng.time.user_time
   1119583 ±  2%     -96.3%      40891           -94.5%      61287        stress-ng.time.voluntary_context_switches

Commit b72e29e0f7 slightly recovers performance but remains far below baseline.

Disclaimer:
Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided
for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software
design or configuration may affect actual performance.


-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki



             reply	other threads:[~2026-08-19  6:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-19  6:20 kernel test robot [this message]
2026-08-19 15:26 ` [linus:master] [x86/bugs] a3af84b0fa: stress-ng.seccomp.ops_per_sec 95.7% regression Dave Hansen
2026-08-19 18:59   ` Pawan Gupta

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202608191340.98574fe2-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=yi1.lai@intel.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.