From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: wen.yang@linux.dev
Cc: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/9] rv: Introduce DA_MON_ALLOCATION_STRATEGY
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2026 18:30:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260819183007.4324E1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <60632bdb34707ffde64381549f1ce09118bd8f5f.1787161646.git.wen.yang@linux.dev>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] DA_ALLOC_POOL strategy causes lockdep 'Invalid wait context' warnings and crashes on PREEMPT_RT when used in tracepoints that hold raw spinlocks.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v5 1/9] rv: Introduce DA_MON_ALLOCATION_STRATEGY ---
commit e8961cb4205551f74e01ec6b7818734bafc846f3
Author: Wen Yang <wen.yang@linux.dev>
rv: Introduce DA_MON_ALLOCATION_STRATEGY
This patch introduces a compile-time selection for per-object deterministic
automata (DA) monitor allocation strategies. It adds DA_ALLOC_AUTO,
DA_ALLOC_POOL, and DA_ALLOC_MANUAL to handle contexts where dynamic memory
allocation is problematic.
> diff --git a/include/rv/da_monitor.h b/include/rv/da_monitor.h
> index e3cf85c9ce556..48c534324cbb2 100644
> --- a/include/rv/da_monitor.h
> +++ b/include/rv/da_monitor.h
[ ... ]
> @@ -543,6 +596,59 @@ static inline monitor_target da_get_target_by_id(da_id_type id)
> return mon_storage->target;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Pre-allocated mempool for DA_ALLOC_POOL monitors: DA_MON_POOL_SIZE
> + * slots, eager-allocated at init. mempool_alloc_preallocated() pops a
> + * slot without touching the allocator (bounded start latency; NULL when
> + * exhausted). mempool_free() is safe from RCU-callback context.
> + * Non-pool monitors get a zero-initialised mempool_t; pool paths compile
> + * away.
> + */
> +static mempool_t da_monitor_pool;
[ ... ]
> +/*
> + * da_create_pool_storage - pop a free pool slot and insert it into the hash.
> + *
> + * Returns the new da_monitor, or NULL if the pool is exhausted. Finding
> + * an existing entry for the same id fires WARN_ON_ONCE (double-start bug).
> + *
> + * Caller must hold an RCU read-side CS and the monitor's serialisation lock.
> + */
> +static inline struct da_monitor *
> +da_create_pool_storage(da_id_type id, monitor_target target,
> + struct da_monitor *da_mon)
> +{
> + struct da_monitor_storage *mon_storage, *existing;
> +
> + if (da_mon)
> + return da_mon;
> +
> + mon_storage = mempool_alloc_preallocated(&da_monitor_pool);
[Severity: High]
Will this cause an "Invalid wait context" lockdep warning or a kernel panic
on PREEMPT_RT systems when executed from tracepoints holding raw spinlocks?
The patch describes DA_ALLOC_POOL as being useful for contexts problematic
for allocation, such as scheduling. If a monitor uses this pool strategy in
a tracepoint like sched_switch, it will be called while holding a
raw_spinlock_t (like rq->lock).
Looking at mempool_alloc_preallocated(), it unconditionally acquires the
pool lock, which is a spinlock_t. On PREEMPT_RT, spinlock_t maps to a
sleepable rt_mutex. Acquiring a sleeping lock while holding a raw_spinlock_t
is a strict wait-context locking violation.
Is there a way to manage the pre-allocated pool in da_create_pool_storage()
without relying on locks that sleep on PREEMPT_RT?
> + if (!mon_storage)
> + return NULL;
> + memset(mon_storage, 0, sizeof(*mon_storage));
> +
> + mon_storage->id = id;
> + mon_storage->target = target;
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1787161646.git.wen.yang@linux.dev?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-19 18:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-19 18:15 [PATCH v5 0/9] rv: Add task latency over budget RV monitor wen.yang
2026-08-19 18:15 ` [PATCH v5 1/9] rv: Introduce DA_MON_ALLOCATION_STRATEGY wen.yang
2026-08-19 18:30 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-19 18:15 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] rv: Add generic uprobe infrastructure for RV monitors wen.yang
2026-08-19 18:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-19 18:15 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] rv: Add tlob model DOT file wen.yang
2026-08-19 18:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-19 18:15 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] rv: Fix ha_invariant_passed_ns silent bypass of invariant check wen.yang
2026-08-19 18:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-19 18:15 ` [PATCH v5 5/9] rv: Make da_monitor_reset_hook and EVENT_NONE_LBL overridable wen.yang
2026-08-19 18:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-19 18:15 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] rv: Add tlob hybrid automaton monitor wen.yang
2026-08-19 18:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-19 18:15 ` [PATCH v5 7/9] rv: Add KUnit tests for the tlob monitor wen.yang
2026-08-19 18:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-19 18:15 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] selftests/verification: Add tlob selftests wen.yang
2026-08-19 18:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-19 18:15 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] selftests/ftrace: Walk up to find test.d/functions when a subdirectory is passed wen.yang
2026-08-19 18:31 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260819183007.4324E1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=wen.yang@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.