From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 204F13812E4; Thu, 20 Aug 2026 17:31:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787247072; cv=none; b=Akgigc4lwh0G7XtuG7Mw2RtyAXLfEZqZB9KoQSMRRxYzX9WFKuTRTOCYQ6WMyRU7JHNii1RlafXBpgc7XlZoiwOH7I5yHPzaS4FnrKXSqu1nBzd0IQswOXKGdIGX4Cv12j5TcrXGjxVXx2pOYtRNDGT9FVm1cw+8Ml21ckdbV28= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787247072; c=relaxed/simple; bh=JqpzM9cjt83U+e0RN0TzUdzzeD+GrNLohFv5+1um19A=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=LGUdzYboA2LX76YJ/au4WE3s96DPhV6D64Jstrb365s7LfvQhRFPWHmpxf7McQV0YwtjblS2ToRNBEhWaGUssN9DhPxdZJ9Xu8f9iJ4BlQ6HZlekP8yNEH5cqhgYTMOngjFuUZ7bYA/5owptcQ+i+GOtMDsfgK3cC/VEGHKD9fI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ACWaXR6j; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ACWaXR6j" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5F2C11F00A3A; Thu, 20 Aug 2026 17:31:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1787247070; bh=VawSvgDX6fqaQP0qKQ8B6xmDg9CDCy/Pi7o+RV+1o7g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=ACWaXR6jAwHB7tv/c8Usip59at2gaF7rL8oSFt7sxp8wtbFVs2stRYjA1zJqy2p9z LRNFKCOk0ZNwKI14iNCaXQIH6gK4/LqNv86PBNtdxK6UFTZiNz1EcVROWnlF4jtj6k HVCiGId+moL/SN3sk7ugERolcUg5sxWGVQpxjdc3TidV65dFNAsvLWdwf/jshHQluR h1TT+MQh2Xy4qp33v2xctAsqnqQNhcby0KMYhLduhtpCJdVFT/kQtJaLY3kGsX99o3 cvqvrQTjWMAN62bcxTrzQHc57fNPE9mrk6uNuWl/RbPdETNIhCoo9G4SirW32Z9pZk 08/tjNmQssbvg== Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2026 10:31:09 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Geliang Tang , Keith Busch , Jens Axboe , Sagi Grimberg , Chaitanya Kulkarni , David Ahern , Ido Schimmel , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , Hannes Reinecke , Stanislav Fomichev , Geliang Tang , linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, mptcp@lists.linux.dev, Breno Leitao Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] nvmet-tcp: unify sockopt with do_sock_setsockopt Message-ID: <20260820103109.4d8ed110@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260819090439.GB9267@lst.de> References: <010e6810cc4c10b30237c964b2bb9dfa7a3c740c.1786947923.git.tanggeliang@kylinos.cn> <20260819090439.GB9267@lst.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 19 Aug 2026 11:04:39 +0200 Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > A key benefit of this refactoring is that it decouples the socket option > > configuration from the underlying transport protocol. This makes it > > easier to extend nvmet-tcp to support other protocols, such as MPTCP, in > > the future, as do_sock_setsockopt() abstracts away protocol-specific > > differences without requiring per-option protocol-specific wrappers. > > We really should have generic helpers in the networking code for this > and not duplicate them in driver using socket options. What do you mean by "for this" ?