From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 937DD373BEC; Thu, 20 Aug 2026 18:15:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787249759; cv=none; b=UcAddd25cNLm8MYcaYsMgUtWvCYV9iby8z4q2NvFchesl48wVtn4Us0duETV5Ke3mzSKuEIDTjOjsFUu14ZEsb8irX3gRqwXL2PLK+Ag8r13iwM/ix/AvSMHj3FP5vhW2VsHGfYGbJQqXSRqGU2QUHhNBJ4H6Lwo55tThGWUAkU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787249759; c=relaxed/simple; bh=m02GxbPae3HHpb9YhEln4ICH1u8J7yJD6qOl/MiIne8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Z9EJ01o0t73Hnk6zFRCscstJ6oWyfT/lVbXtbG2uxTv8Y/ttWwWTOwXy+McE4dGeZRvdb+iMT3E6F6UrR17yWyivyHpweZ8aj/OzS4d9KONNTJrMINpE+uX+FhRhQ14wO9/GMbUGh5SCu+HQj8jeFvmgyoQZVuUHAzxwJdbOUyY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Jysh5DiY; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Jysh5DiY" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EAFCE1F000E9; Thu, 20 Aug 2026 18:15:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1787249758; bh=GxT8va7ovcOW04vuuKemjJnnKgZnMkYMnuFtSFLB9Q0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=Jysh5DiYnHkR2ItPWNQFwJJD0GRas3EJR6BTgHSsfcMicXjQFoHfmErxHteLJkjkp 6iEDwFcUe3iRit5JTRFfEdLezCqlfnhwJ1QL8oCiJ5MkPKZQkvkUGcV55UegW/A0Q/ VGx6FaoTzE8c38vMKjWP0LVJ8XMmLctkVThD4nI7laEmlPRzSAPqEMuOZPPL1t0zNr sMHof2eXdYpE8lrrr6Kff9YacDkbzwV1XTk988COEWY/KXU7s2rgziMq3bX6iZ3eXg f/Cwgb6t5WEFK+CM7veqeGWl0U5WHxX8bmrU+rjRCXbxuQTCxdE0TCtoCrZwQI2J0p s4U03C8CYHA1w== Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2026 11:15:57 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Thomas Walsh Cc: Pavan Chebbi , Michael Chan , Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Michal Schmidt Subject: Re: [PATCH net] bnxt_en: Gate TPH enablement behind BNXT_SUPPORTS_QUEUE_API check Message-ID: <20260820111557.49f658a4@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20260818141556.64303-1-thwalsh@redhat.com> <20260820103950.5dfa2969@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 20 Aug 2026 13:55:57 -0400 Thomas Walsh wrote: > In this particular situation, the customer had very recently upgraded their > firmware. "RX queue restart failed: err=-95" messages were still observed. Would you be able to share the NIC and the FW version? Could it be that they upgraded to a version which has TPH but not queue resets yet? I _think_ queue resets came in 232.x but maybe there were bugs which delayed it later.