All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Linus Walleij" <linusw@kernel.org>
Cc: dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org, Frank.Li@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix probe runtime PM disable
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2026 13:29:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260820132942.019D71F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260820-dma40-fixes-v2-7-63238334c707@kernel.org>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] request_irq() is called before PM runtime is enabled, which can cause an IRQ storm if an interrupt is pending.
- [High] The driver systematically ignores the return value of pm_runtime_get_sync(), failing to handle resume errors.
--

--- Patch [7]: [PATCH v2 07/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix probe runtime PM disable ---
commit 95c55fe7afd321bc228d4b1a735de2f4eb7a79fc
Author: Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>

dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix probe runtime PM disable

This commit fixes an issue where some d40_probe() error paths disable
runtime PM even if it was never enabled for the device. It introduces a
boolean flag to track whether runtime PM was actually enabled, keeping the
disable_depth balanced during probe failures.

Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/dmaengine/20260618051539.15E201F000E9@smtp.kernel.org/

> diff --git a/drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c b/drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c
> index 739e47941d0cc..0c9094b4c4ade 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/ste_dma40.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -3633,6 +3634,7 @@ static int __init d40_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(base->dev);
>  	pm_runtime_set_active(base->dev);
>  	pm_runtime_enable(base->dev);
> +	runtime_pm_enabled = true;

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but request_irq() is called before PM
runtime is enabled, which could cause an IRQ storm if an interrupt is
pending.

If an interrupt triggers before runtime PM is enabled, the ISR
d40_handle_interrupt() fails to clear it:

d40_handle_interrupt() {
    ...
    ret = pm_runtime_get_if_active(base->dev);
    if (ret <= 0)
        return IRQ_NONE;
    ...
}

Because pm_runtime_get_if_active() returns an error when runtime PM is
disabled, the handler returns IRQ_NONE without clearing the hardware
interrupt. This causes the interrupt to continually re-trigger.

Could the request_irq() call be moved after pm_runtime_enable() to
prevent this?

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but the driver systematically ignores the
return value of pm_runtime_get_sync().

If the device fails to resume due to PM subsystem issues or memory
pressure, does this cause the driver to access powered-off hardware
registers?

For example, in d40_queue_start():

d40_queue_start() {
    ...
    pm_runtime_get_sync(d40c->base->dev);
    /* hardware accesses follow */
    ...
}

Similar unchecked calls exist in d40_pause(), d40_resume(), and
d40_free_dma(). Could these be updated to check for negative error codes
and abort if the resume fails?

>  
>  	dma_set_max_seg_size(base->dev, STEDMA40_MAX_SEG_SIZE);
>  
> @@ -3678,7 +3680,8 @@ static int __init d40_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		regulator_disable(base->lcpa_regulator);
>  		regulator_put(base->lcpa_regulator);
>  	}
> -	pm_runtime_disable(base->dev);
> +	if (runtime_pm_enabled)
> +		pm_runtime_disable(base->dev);
>  
>   report_failure:
>  	d40_err(dev, "probe failed\n");

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260820-dma40-fixes-v2-0-63238334c707@kernel.org?part=7

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-20 13:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-20 13:14 [PATCH v2 00/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix probe and allocation bugs Linus Walleij
2026-08-20 13:14 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix failed start cleanup Linus Walleij
2026-08-20 13:30   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 13:14 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Check runtime PM in IRQ Linus Walleij
2026-08-20 13:31   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 13:14 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Init hardware before registration Linus Walleij
2026-08-20 13:14 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix DMA registration unwind Linus Walleij
2026-08-20 13:30   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 13:14 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix LCLA allocation order Linus Walleij
2026-08-20 13:29   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 13:15 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix probe LCLA free Linus Walleij
2026-08-20 13:15 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix probe runtime PM disable Linus Walleij
2026-08-20 13:29   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-20 13:15 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix probe IRQ leak Linus Walleij
2026-08-20 13:29   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 13:15 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix memcpy channel parsing Linus Walleij
2026-08-20 13:29   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 13:15 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix logical channel bounds check Linus Walleij
2026-08-20 13:32   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 13:15 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Fix event group bounds Linus Walleij
2026-08-20 13:34   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 13:15 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Validate memcpy configuration Linus Walleij
2026-08-20 13:37   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 13:15 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] dmaengine: Use unique debugfs names Linus Walleij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260820132942.019D71F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
    --cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linusw@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.