From: Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>
To: dengler@linux.ibm.com, fcallies@linux.ibm.com, ifranzki@linux.ibm.com
Cc: freude@linux.ibm.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 5/8] s390/crypto: Fix handling of EBUSY in PAES when req is pushed to crypto engine
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2026 16:19:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260820141957.19091-6-freude@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260820141957.19091-1-freude@linux.ibm.com>
When a request is transferred to the engine via
crypto_transfer_skcipher_request_to_engine() there are two return
codes signaling a successful transfer: EINPROGRESS and EBUSY. However
the correct handling of EBUSY was missing and has been added as a
return code indicating a successful transfer to the crypto engine.
Fixes: 6cd87cb5ef6c ("s390/crypto: Rework protected key AES for true asynch support")
Signed-off-by: Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Holger Dengler <dengler@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.16+
---
arch/s390/crypto/paes_s390.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/crypto/paes_s390.c b/arch/s390/crypto/paes_s390.c
index 03446bfac37f..2048327c1ffe 100644
--- a/arch/s390/crypto/paes_s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/crypto/paes_s390.c
@@ -463,6 +463,7 @@ static int ecb_paes_crypt(struct skcipher_request *req, unsigned long modifier)
struct s390_paes_ctx *ctx = crypto_skcipher_ctx(tfm);
struct skcipher_walk *walk = &req_ctx->walk;
bool tested = crypto_skcipher_tested(tfm);
+ bool cleanup = true;
int rc;
/*
@@ -494,15 +495,17 @@ static int ecb_paes_crypt(struct skcipher_request *req, unsigned long modifier)
if (rc == 0 || rc == -EKEYEXPIRED) {
atomic_inc(&ctx->via_engine_ctr);
rc = crypto_transfer_skcipher_request_to_engine(paes_crypto_engine, req);
- if (rc != -EINPROGRESS)
+ if (rc == -EINPROGRESS || rc == -EBUSY)
+ cleanup = false;
+ else
atomic_dec(&ctx->via_engine_ctr);
}
- if (rc != -EINPROGRESS && walk->nbytes)
+ if (cleanup && walk->nbytes)
skcipher_walk_done(walk, rc);
out:
- if (rc != -EINPROGRESS)
+ if (cleanup)
memzero_explicit(&req_ctx->param, sizeof(req_ctx->param));
pr_debug("rc=%d\n", rc);
return rc;
@@ -732,6 +735,7 @@ static int cbc_paes_crypt(struct skcipher_request *req, unsigned long modifier)
struct s390_paes_ctx *ctx = crypto_skcipher_ctx(tfm);
struct skcipher_walk *walk = &req_ctx->walk;
bool tested = crypto_skcipher_tested(tfm);
+ bool cleanup = true;
int rc;
/*
@@ -763,15 +767,17 @@ static int cbc_paes_crypt(struct skcipher_request *req, unsigned long modifier)
if (rc == 0 || rc == -EKEYEXPIRED) {
atomic_inc(&ctx->via_engine_ctr);
rc = crypto_transfer_skcipher_request_to_engine(paes_crypto_engine, req);
- if (rc != -EINPROGRESS)
+ if (rc == -EINPROGRESS || rc == -EBUSY)
+ cleanup = false;
+ else
atomic_dec(&ctx->via_engine_ctr);
}
- if (rc != -EINPROGRESS && walk->nbytes)
+ if (cleanup && walk->nbytes)
skcipher_walk_done(walk, rc);
out:
- if (rc != -EINPROGRESS)
+ if (cleanup)
memzero_explicit(&req_ctx->param, sizeof(req_ctx->param));
pr_debug("rc=%d\n", rc);
return rc;
@@ -1059,6 +1065,7 @@ static int ctr_paes_crypt(struct skcipher_request *req)
struct s390_paes_ctx *ctx = crypto_skcipher_ctx(tfm);
struct skcipher_walk *walk = &req_ctx->walk;
bool tested = crypto_skcipher_tested(tfm);
+ bool cleanup = true;
int rc;
/*
@@ -1089,15 +1096,17 @@ static int ctr_paes_crypt(struct skcipher_request *req)
if (rc == 0 || rc == -EKEYEXPIRED) {
atomic_inc(&ctx->via_engine_ctr);
rc = crypto_transfer_skcipher_request_to_engine(paes_crypto_engine, req);
- if (rc != -EINPROGRESS)
+ if (rc == -EINPROGRESS || rc == -EBUSY)
+ cleanup = false;
+ else
atomic_dec(&ctx->via_engine_ctr);
}
- if (rc != -EINPROGRESS && walk->nbytes)
+ if (cleanup && walk->nbytes)
skcipher_walk_done(walk, rc);
out:
- if (rc != -EINPROGRESS)
+ if (cleanup)
memzero_explicit(&req_ctx->param, sizeof(req_ctx->param));
pr_debug("rc=%d\n", rc);
return rc;
@@ -1498,6 +1507,7 @@ static inline int xts_paes_crypt(struct skcipher_request *req, unsigned long mod
struct s390_pxts_ctx *ctx = crypto_skcipher_ctx(tfm);
struct skcipher_walk *walk = &req_ctx->walk;
bool tested = crypto_skcipher_tested(tfm);
+ bool cleanup = true;
int rc;
/*
@@ -1529,15 +1539,17 @@ static inline int xts_paes_crypt(struct skcipher_request *req, unsigned long mod
if (rc == 0 || rc == -EKEYEXPIRED) {
atomic_inc(&ctx->via_engine_ctr);
rc = crypto_transfer_skcipher_request_to_engine(paes_crypto_engine, req);
- if (rc != -EINPROGRESS)
+ if (rc == -EINPROGRESS || rc == -EBUSY)
+ cleanup = false;
+ else
atomic_dec(&ctx->via_engine_ctr);
}
- if (rc != -EINPROGRESS && walk->nbytes)
+ if (cleanup && walk->nbytes)
skcipher_walk_done(walk, rc);
out:
- if (rc != -EINPROGRESS)
+ if (cleanup)
memzero_explicit(&req_ctx->param, sizeof(req_ctx->param));
pr_debug("rc=%d\n", rc);
return rc;
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-20 14:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-20 14:19 [PATCH v5 0/8] Fixes and rework for paes_s390 and phmac_s390 Harald Freudenberger
2026-08-20 14:19 ` [PATCH v5 1/8] s390/crypto: Fix return code handling at skcipher_walk_done in PAES algorithms Harald Freudenberger
2026-08-20 14:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 14:19 ` [PATCH v5 2/8] s390/crypto: Fix missing scrub of temp buffers with PAES algorithm Harald Freudenberger
2026-08-20 14:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 14:19 ` [PATCH v5 3/8] s390/crypto: Fix use of mutex in atomic context in PAES Harald Freudenberger
2026-08-20 14:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 14:19 ` [PATCH v5 4/8] s390/crypto: Fix missing cra_flags in paes_s390 Harald Freudenberger
2026-08-20 14:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 14:19 ` Harald Freudenberger [this message]
2026-08-20 14:31 ` [PATCH v5 5/8] s390/crypto: Fix handling of EBUSY in PAES when req is pushed to crypto engine sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 14:19 ` [PATCH v5 6/8] s390/crypto: Fix handling of EBUSY in PHMAC " Harald Freudenberger
2026-08-20 14:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 14:19 ` [PATCH v5 7/8] s390/crypto: Fix wrong return code to engine in asynch callbacks Harald Freudenberger
2026-08-20 14:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 14:19 ` [PATCH v5 8/8] s390/crypto: Map EBUSY to EIO when key conversion fails repeatedly Harald Freudenberger
2026-08-20 14:32 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260820141957.19091-6-freude@linux.ibm.com \
--to=freude@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=dengler@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=fcallies@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ifranzki@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.