From: Ridong Chen <ridong.chen@linux.dev>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>, Qi Zheng <qi.zheng@linux.dev>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>, Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>,
Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
Yuanchu Xie <yuanchu@google.com>, Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ridong Chen <ridong.chen@linux.dev>,
Ridong Chen <chenridong@xiaomi.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 3/4] mm/vmscan: drop the combined limit gate in __node_reclaim()
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2026 16:17:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260821081741.1340277-4-ridong.chen@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260821081741.1340277-1-ridong.chen@linux.dev>
From: Ridong Chen <chenridong@xiaomi.com>
__node_reclaim() only ran shrink_node() when unmapped page cache was
over min_unmapped_pages OR reclaimable slab was over min_slab_pages.
With slab and file reclaim now gated per type by sc->skip_slab_reclaim and
sc->skip_file_reclaim, this combined gate is either redundant or harmful:
- for the NUMA node reclaim caller it is always true, since
node_reclaim() only calls in when at least one limit is exceeded;
- for the per-node proactive reclaim caller (which does not go through
node_reclaim()'s checks) it wrongly suppressed all reclaim -- anon
included -- whenever both page cache and slab happened to sit at or
below their limits, even with plenty of reclaimable anon present.
Drop the gate and let the per-type flags decide what to reclaim. The
node reclaim path is unchanged; the proactive path can now reclaim anon
as requested.
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-8
Signed-off-by: Ridong Chen <chenridong@xiaomi.com>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 1e56973ceb73..5a3f67b3ba32 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -7906,16 +7906,16 @@ static unsigned long __node_reclaim(struct pglist_data *pgdat,
noreclaim_flag = memalloc_noreclaim_save();
set_task_reclaim_state(p, &sc->reclaim_state);
- if (node_pagecache_reclaimable(pgdat) > pgdat->min_unmapped_pages ||
- node_page_state_pages(pgdat, NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE_B) > pgdat->min_slab_pages) {
- /*
- * Free memory by calling shrink node with increasing
- * priorities until we have enough memory freed.
- */
- do {
- shrink_node(pgdat, sc);
- } while (sc->nr_reclaimed < nr_pages && --sc->priority >= 0);
- }
+ /*
+ * Free memory by calling shrink node with increasing
+ * priorities until we have enough memory freed.
+ *
+ * What to reclaim is gated per type by sc->skip_slab_reclaim and
+ * sc->skip_file_reclaim.
+ */
+ do {
+ shrink_node(pgdat, sc);
+ } while (sc->nr_reclaimed < nr_pages && --sc->priority >= 0);
set_task_reclaim_state(p, NULL);
memalloc_noreclaim_restore(noreclaim_flag);
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-21 8:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-21 8:17 [RFC PATCH 0/4] mm/vmscan: honour node reclaim limits per type Ridong Chen
2026-08-21 8:17 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] mm/vmscan: only reclaim slab in node reclaim when over min_slab_pages Ridong Chen
2026-08-21 8:17 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] mm/vmscan: only reclaim file pages in node reclaim when over min_unmapped_pages Ridong Chen
2026-08-21 8:17 ` Ridong Chen [this message]
2026-08-21 12:49 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] mm/vmscan: drop the combined limit gate in __node_reclaim() Johannes Weiner
2026-08-21 8:17 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] mm/vmscan: do not skip node reclaim when only anon is reclaimable Ridong Chen
2026-08-21 8:31 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] mm/vmscan: honour node reclaim limits per type Michal Hocko
2026-08-21 8:58 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-08-21 9:21 ` Michal Hocko
2026-08-21 11:16 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-08-21 11:26 ` Michal Hocko
2026-08-21 13:43 ` Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM)
2026-08-21 9:07 ` Ridong Chen
2026-08-21 9:24 ` Michal Hocko
2026-08-21 10:52 ` Ridong Chen
2026-08-21 11:02 ` Michal Hocko
2026-08-21 11:10 ` Ridong Chen
2026-08-21 11:20 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260821081741.1340277-4-ridong.chen@linux.dev \
--to=ridong.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=chenridong@xiaomi.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kasong@tencent.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=qi.zheng@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=weixugc@google.com \
--cc=yuanchu@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.