From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jens Remus" <jremus@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 21/24] unwind_user/eh_frame/x86: Handle DRAP expressions
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2026 20:15:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260821201510.4285E1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260821195259.2688377-22-jremus@linux.ibm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The newly added DRAP DWARF expression handling for the Frame Pointer (FP) uses a generic register rule that unconditionally fails for non-topmost frames, causing premature stack trace truncation.
--
--- Patch [21]: [RFC PATCH v2 21/24] unwind_user/eh_frame/x86: Handle DRAP expressions ---
commit a27cd1aa620d26189650492016f14beeb35a7207
Author: Jens Remus <jremus@linux.ibm.com>
unwind_user/eh_frame/x86: Handle DRAP expressions
This commit adds x86-specific handling for DRAP CFA and FP expressions.
It supports unwinding through frames with dynamically realigned stacks by
parsing the corresponding DWARF expressions.
> diff --git a/kernel/unwind/eh_frame.c b/kernel/unwind/eh_frame.c
> --- a/kernel/unwind/eh_frame.c
> +++ b/kernel/unwind/eh_frame.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1184,6 +1209,16 @@ static __always_inline int __find_frame_row(struct eh_frame_section *sec,
> frame->fp.regnum = ctx.state.reg_regnum[FP_IDX];
> frame->fp.offset = 0;
> break;
> + case REG_REGISTER_OFFSET_DEREF:
> + if (ctx.state.reg_regnum[FP_IDX] > UINT_MAX)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + if (ctx.state.reg_offset[FP_IDX] < INT_MIN ||
> + ctx.state.reg_offset[FP_IDX] > INT_MAX)
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + frame->fp.rule = UNWIND_USER_RULE_REG_OFFSET_DEREF;
> + frame->fp.regnum = ctx.state.reg_regnum[FP_IDX];
> + frame->fp.offset = ctx.state.reg_offset[FP_IDX];
> + break;
[Severity: Medium]
Will this generic register rule cause stack trace truncation for non-topmost
frames?
Looking at unwind_user_next_common(), UNWIND_USER_RULE_REG_OFFSET_DEREF is
unconditionally rejected unless it's the topmost frame:
kernel/unwind/user.c:unwind_user_next_common() {
...
case UNWIND_USER_RULE_REG_OFFSET_DEREF:
if (!state->topmost || unwind_user_get_reg(&fp, frame->fp.regnum))
return -EINVAL;
...
}
Because EH_FRAME_REG_FP is tracked across frames, could this use a dedicated
FP rule to avoid aborting the stack trace when encountering a DRAP frame that
isn't the innermost frame?
> default:
> return -EINVAL;
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260821195259.2688377-1-jremus@linux.ibm.com?part=21
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-21 20:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-21 19:52 [RFC PATCH v2 00/24] unwind_user: Implement .eh_frame handling Jens Remus
2026-08-21 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/24] unwind_user: Add generic and arch-specific headers to MAINTAINERS Jens Remus
2026-08-21 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/24] unwind_user: Stop when reaching an outermost frame Jens Remus
2026-08-21 20:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-21 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/24] unwind_user: Enable archs that pass RA in a register Jens Remus
2026-08-21 20:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-21 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/24] unwind_user: Flexible FP/RA recovery rules Jens Remus
2026-08-21 20:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-21 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/24] unwind_user: Flexible CFA " Jens Remus
2026-08-21 20:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-21 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/24] unwind_user: Enable archs that define CFA = SP_callsite + offset Jens Remus
2026-08-21 20:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-21 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/24] unwind_user/eh_frame: Add support for reading .eh_frame_hdr section Jens Remus
2026-08-21 20:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-21 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/24] unwind_user/eh_frame: Store .eh_frame_hdr section data in per-mm maple tree Jens Remus
2026-08-21 20:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-21 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/24] unwind_user/eh_frame: Add support for reading .eh_frame section Jens Remus
2026-08-21 20:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-21 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/24] unwind_user/eh_frame: Detect .eh_frame_hdr sections in executables Jens Remus
2026-08-21 20:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-21 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/24] unwind_user/eh_frame: Wire up unwind_user to eh_frame Jens Remus
2026-08-21 20:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-21 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/24] unwind_user/eh_frame: Remove .eh_frame[_hdr] section on detected corruption Jens Remus
2026-08-21 20:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-21 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/24] unwind_user/eh_frame: Show file name in debug output Jens Remus
2026-08-21 20:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-21 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 14/24] unwind_user/eh_frame: Add .eh_frame[_hdr] validation option Jens Remus
2026-08-21 20:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-21 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 15/24] unwind_user/eh_frame: Duplicate registered .eh_frame[_hdr] section data on clone/fork Jens Remus
2026-08-21 20:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-21 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 16/24] unwind_user/eh_frame: Ignore DW_CFA_GNU_args_size Jens Remus
2026-08-21 20:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-21 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 17/24] unwind_user/eh_frame: Add support for DWARF expressions Jens Remus
2026-08-21 20:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-21 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 18/24] x86/uaccess: Add unsafe_copy_from_user() implementation Jens Remus
2026-08-21 20:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-21 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 19/24] unwind_user/eh_frame/x86: Enable eh_frame unwinding on x86 Jens Remus
2026-08-21 20:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-21 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 20/24] unwind_user/eh_frame/x86: Handle PLT expressions Jens Remus
2026-08-21 20:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-21 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 21/24] unwind_user/eh_frame/x86: Handle DRAP expressions Jens Remus
2026-08-21 20:15 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-21 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 22/24] s390/ptrace: Provide frame_pointer() Jens Remus
2026-08-21 20:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-21 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 23/24] unwind_user/eh_frame/s390: Enable eh_frame unwinding on s390 Jens Remus
2026-08-21 20:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-21 19:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 24/24] unwind_user/eh_frame: Add prctl() interface for (un)registering .eh_frame_hdr sections Jens Remus
2026-08-21 20:22 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260821201510.4285E1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jremus@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.