From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Li Pengfei <ljdlns1987@gmail.com>
Cc: mhiramat@kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
mark.rutland@arm.com, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zhangbo56@xiaomi.com,
lipengfei28@xiaomi.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 1/3] trace: add lock-free stackmap for stack trace deduplication
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2026 23:51:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260821235129.078dd489@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260715031245.2571869-1-lipengfei28@xiaomi.com>
On Wed, 15 Jul 2026 11:12:45 +0800
Li Pengfei <ljdlns1987@gmail.com> wrote:
Sorry for the late reply, I haven't had the time to look deeply at this
series.
>
> One design point I'd like your steer on before respinning: reset
> checks tracer_tracing_is_on() once under trace_types_lock, but
> traceon triggers (ftrace_traceon / traceon_trigger) can re-enable
> tracing without that lock during reset's clear phase. As far as I
> can tell this is a semantic-contract issue, not a memory-safety
> one: the map is protected by the resetting flag (get_id bails with
> -EINVAL and synchronize_rcu() drains in-flight callers), and the
> ring buffer pages aren't freed by reset, so the worst case is a
> non-empty / inconsistent buffer after reset rather than corruption.
> So I'm leaning toward documenting reset as best-effort ("stop
> tracing, including traceon triggers, before reset") rather than
> adding machinery to block the window. Does that match your view, or
> is there a ring-buffer-state hazard I'm missing that would justify
> blocking it explicitly?
Honestly, I don't think we need to be as strict on reset as you are
trying to be. What is the worse thing that happens if a reset happens
while the buffer is not cleared and the trace still exists?
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-22 3:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-16 6:41 [RFC PATCH v4 0/3] trace: stack trace deduplication for ftrace ring buffer Li Pengfei
2026-06-16 6:41 ` [RFC PATCH v4 1/3] trace: add lock-free stackmap for stack trace deduplication Li Pengfei
2026-07-14 21:11 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-07-15 3:12 ` Li Pengfei
2026-08-03 2:20 ` Li Pengfei
2026-08-22 3:51 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2026-09-01 3:10 ` Li Pengfei
2026-06-16 6:41 ` [RFC PATCH v4 2/3] trace: integrate stackmap into ftrace stack recording path Li Pengfei
2026-07-14 21:53 ` Steven Rostedt
2026-06-16 6:41 ` [RFC PATCH v4 3/3] trace: add documentation, selftest and tooling for stackmap Li Pengfei
2026-07-06 6:31 ` [RFC PATCH v4 0/3] trace: stack trace deduplication for ftrace ring buffer Li Pengfei
2026-07-10 19:14 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260821235129.078dd489@fedora \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lipengfei28@xiaomi.com \
--cc=ljdlns1987@gmail.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=zhangbo56@xiaomi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.