From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 389EB3546EB; Sat, 22 Aug 2026 20:44:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787431444; cv=none; b=J63S/r1aEEfl4Dd1w3I34fa9vd94SVIGsIvoCK4fI9OQvsmNYmpI49enAcSnP+ZRopjzhAgYYcildhN2a33hRbVBegKszBznxJx77qq3Q14V62pCJO1FWPfiSVrP4Q5y+BRfFNtIrUSsTdwKR1TOXHwUk2AiSqhbDRTm/tOZvOY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787431444; c=relaxed/simple; bh=pE8em5ESimq7kEnbnIQn70TryphkT/GM8iNNxBxf+uo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Af4bfT2AgU8XiJYAk9QpAFFfepaIdiqsUuNrH0mOsT1LmjuUOt+iS0WfK781fpDp4R7i9br+hL2qrxg+TYFoqQHhNreeZFWAhADgowRoxDbbsS0nl2OA9ApuRMxwb7susj0jOVIAD9Khwot6rR50ucN6NkIc0E81SO3aiRfkEgU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=PCaghFYk; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="PCaghFYk" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6058A1F000E9; Sat, 22 Aug 2026 20:44:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1787431442; bh=Vvmofg7n35kucFRZzzYsmckgLsmxC+unu3ShITZiohw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=PCaghFYklys7Ri5/HUtvzxJYBjO1PheJgWcdUGbPI9dyq3L16RwV/PG1npbwL7DVN +HB7pjJd3eAOtveNrsigEnvSVPyNpF51XWJARJFmwXVkyd56YyP0Sn7SJy8QPIDKcl NSB6zLPQyZzYTMdkS6KouDpDiG2Tee0zrArxQdDzX0E37ABGBhl9m/FWHaWS0jqfHG KdBoAIR6XNI52Mx5+3C0Vr3NYdGL0Av14rVWrVk9mGxYT0TFtHGcNOZ+4p8b3EGHFH JdWS/iKgsXsKYWZCNFK2sCNLG4mPB+nzqncqfc2HuRIrMhb07bBG7oFTj+dVYIrRn5 Rr1Expq8ekHZQ== Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2026 13:44:01 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Jamal Hadi Salim Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Pirko , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , John Fastabend , stable@vger.kernel.org, vega@nebusec.ai, "Victor Nogueira" Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/2] net/sched: pfifo_fast: cap ring size and account to memcg Message-ID: <20260822134401.6545e4eb@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20260820095742.68511-1-jhs@mojatatu.com> References: <20260820095742.68511-1-jhs@mojatatu.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 20 Aug 2026 05:57:41 -0400 Jamal Hadi Salim wrote: > + if (qlen > 65535) { > + pr_warn_ratelimited("pfifo_fast: capping ring size %u to 65535 for dev %s\n", > + qlen, qdisc_dev(qdisc)->name); > + qlen = 65535; > + } Why not a hard cap? We do that all over the place, once in a release we pick a value too small and someone quickly sends us a fix up to bump the number. No problem.