From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Rosen Penev" <rosenp@gmail.com>
Cc: Frank.Li@kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: bestcomm: ioremap early
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2026 04:56:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260823045641.2E8B81F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260823044900.11466-1-rosenp@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The globally exported pointer `bcom_eng` is left dangling if `mpc52xx_bcom_probe()` fails after allocating it, leading to a potential Use-After-Free.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH] dmaengine: bestcomm: ioremap early ---
commit 58088fd211b9916066bb25d1ffe4afa62733063f
Author: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
dmaengine: bestcomm: ioremap early
This commit replaces open-coded resource lookup and mapping in the
probe function with the managed devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource()
helper. It also addresses a resource size mismatch between allocation
and freeing.
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/bestcomm/bestcomm.c b/drivers/dma/bestcomm/bestcomm.c
> --- a/drivers/dma/bestcomm/bestcomm.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/bestcomm/bestcomm.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -439,10 +422,6 @@ static int mpc52xx_bcom_probe(struct platform_device *op)
> return 0;
>
> /* Error path */
> -error_unmap:
> - iounmap(bcom_eng->regs);
> -error_release:
> - release_mem_region(res_bcom.start, sizeof(struct mpc52xx_sdma));
> error_sramclean:
> kfree(bcom_eng);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but if mpc52xx_bcom_probe() fails after
allocating bcom_eng (for instance, if bcom_engine_init() fails), does this
leave the globally exported pointer bcom_eng dangling?
If it remains non-NULL after kfree(), a dependent driver like mpc52xx_fec
might later call bcom_task_alloc(), which checks if (!bcom_eng) to verify
initialization. Since the check passes, could this lead to a use-after-free
when it accesses bcom_eng->lock?
Should bcom_eng be set to NULL here, similar to how it is handled in
mpc52xx_bcom_remove()?
> bcom_sram_cleanup();
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260823044900.11466-1-rosenp@gmail.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-23 4:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-23 4:49 [PATCH] dmaengine: bestcomm: ioremap early Rosen Penev
2026-08-23 4:56 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-23 8:00 ` Markus Elfring
2026-08-24 20:23 ` Rosen Penev
2026-08-25 7:56 ` Markus Elfring
2026-08-24 15:25 ` [PATCH] " Frank Li
2026-08-24 20:24 ` Rosen Penev
2026-08-25 14:39 ` Frank Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260823045641.2E8B81F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rosenp@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.