From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Abel Vesa" <abel.vesa@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 14/47] clk: qcom: gcc-qdu1000: Tie the CX power domain to controller
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2026 12:28:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260824122825.06D6E1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260824-qcom-tie-cx-to-gcc-v3-14-f1205a92682b@oss.qualcomm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [Low] Missing DT Binding Update for `power-domains` property.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] System crash (synchronous external abort) due to unclocked register access during `clk_round_rate()` on DFS clocks.
- [High] System crash due to missing PM Runtime protection in reset operations.
--
--- Patch [14]: [PATCH v3 14/47] clk: qcom: gcc-qdu1000: Tie the CX power domain to controller ---
commit 51623b28802cf5aef15aece18cd9939c8e2691bb
Author: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@oss.qualcomm.com>
clk: qcom: gcc-qdu1000: Tie the CX power domain to controller
Enable runtime PM for the controller, allowing CX to be powered down
once all GCC consumers have released their clocks and GDSCs.
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-qdu1000.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-qdu1000.c
> index 915bb9b4ff813..172303ac4c9bb 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-qdu1000.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-qdu1000.c
> @@ -2649,6 +2649,7 @@ static const struct qcom_cc_desc gcc_qdu1000_desc = {
> .num_resets = ARRAY_SIZE(gcc_qdu1000_resets),
> .gdscs = gcc_qdu1000_gdscs,
> .num_gdscs = ARRAY_SIZE(gcc_qdu1000_gdscs),
> + .use_rpm = true,
[Severity: Low]
Does enabling runtime PM here introduce a dependency on a power-domains
property that needs to be documented in the controller's specific binding?
Without updating qcom,qdu1000-gcc.yaml, might this lead to missing DT
constraints or dtbs_check warnings?
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but enabling runtime PM for this
controller exposes a pre-existing issue in the DFS clocks implementation.
When a consumer driver calls clk_round_rate() on an unprepared DFS clock,
the CCF clk_round_rate() API calls determine_rate() without holding a PM
runtime reference.
If the GCC device is suspended (CX domain off), can this sequence cause a
synchronous external abort due to unclocked register access?
drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rcg2.c:clk_rcg2_dfs_determine_rate() {
...
ret = clk_rcg2_dfs_populate_freq_table(rcg);
...
}
drivers/clk/qcom/clk-rcg2.c:clk_rcg2_dfs_populate_freq_table() {
...
regmap_read(rcg->clkr.regmap, rcg->cmd_rcgr + SE_PERF_DFSR(l), &cfg);
...
}
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but enabling runtime PM on the QDU1000
controller also exposes a vulnerability in the reset operations.
The reset functions appear to access hardware registers directly without
using pm_runtime_resume_and_get() on the GCC device.
If a consumer asserts or deasserts a reset while the GCC provider is
runtime suspended, will this unclocked register access crash the system?
drivers/clk/qcom/reset.c:qcom_reset_set_assert() {
...
regmap_update_bits(rst->regmap, map->reg, mask, assert ? mask : 0);
...
}
> };
>
> static const struct of_device_id gcc_qdu1000_match_table[] = {
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260824-qcom-tie-cx-to-gcc-v3-0-f1205a92682b@oss.qualcomm.com?part=14
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-24 12:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-24 11:53 [PATCH v3 00/47] clk: qcom: Tie CX power domains to GCCs Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:53 ` [PATCH v3 01/47] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: gcc-sdm845: Add CX power domain Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 20:39 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-08-25 7:30 ` Abel Vesa
2026-08-25 7:34 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-08-25 8:01 ` Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:53 ` [PATCH v3 02/47] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: gcc-sm8150: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:53 ` [PATCH v3 03/47] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: gcc-sm8250: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:53 ` [PATCH v3 04/47] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: gcc-sm8350: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 12:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 11:53 ` [PATCH v3 05/47] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: gcc-sm8450: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 12:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 11:53 ` [PATCH v3 06/47] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: qcs615-gcc: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:53 ` [PATCH v3 07/47] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: sm8550-gcc: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 12:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 11:53 ` [PATCH v3 08/47] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: sm8650-gcc: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 12:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 11:53 ` [PATCH v3 09/47] dt-bindings: clock: qcom: sm8750-gcc: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:53 ` [PATCH v3 10/47] clk: qcom: gcc-eliza: Tie the CX power domain to controller Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:53 ` [PATCH v3 11/47] clk: qcom: gcc-kaanapali: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:53 ` [PATCH v3 12/47] clk: qcom: gcc-qcs615: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 12:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 13/47] clk: qcom: gcc-qcs8300: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 12:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 14/47] clk: qcom: gcc-qdu1000: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 12:28 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 15/47] clk: qcom: gcc-sa8775p: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 16/47] clk: qcom: gcc-sar2130p: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 12:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 17/47] clk: qcom: gcc-sc7180: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 12:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 18/47] clk: qcom: gcc-sc7280: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 12:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 19/47] clk: qcom: gcc-sdm670: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 12:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 20/47] clk: qcom: gcc-sdm845: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 12:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 21/47] clk: qcom: gcc-sdx75: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 22/47] clk: qcom: gcc-sm4450: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 23/47] clk: qcom: gcc-sm6350: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 12:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 24/47] clk: qcom: gcc-sm8150: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 12:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 25/47] clk: qcom: gcc-sm8250: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 26/47] clk: qcom: gcc-sm8350: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 12:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 27/47] clk: qcom: gcc-sm8450: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 28/47] clk: qcom: gcc-sm8550: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 29/47] clk: qcom: gcc-sm8650: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 30/47] clk: qcom: gcc-sm8750: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 31/47] clk: qcom: gcc-x1e80100: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 32/47] arm64: dts: qcom: kaanapali: Add GCC CX power domain Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 33/47] arm64: dts: qcom: monaco: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 12:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 34/47] arm64: dts: qcom: qdu1000: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 12:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 35/47] arm64: dts: qcom: sar2130p: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 36/47] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm670: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 37/47] arm64: dts: qcom: sdx75: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 12:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 38/47] arm64: dts: qcom: sm4450: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 39/47] arm64: dts: qcom: sm6350: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 12:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 40/47] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8150: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 41/47] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8250: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 42/47] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8350: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 43/47] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 44/47] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8550: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 45/47] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8650: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 46/47] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8750: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 47/47] arm64: dts: qcom: talos: " Abel Vesa
2026-08-24 16:28 ` [PATCH v3 00/47] clk: qcom: Tie CX power domains to GCCs Vinod Koul
2026-08-25 7:32 ` Abel Vesa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260824122825.06D6E1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=abel.vesa@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.