From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E03C941DE1B for ; Mon, 24 Aug 2026 13:26:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787578003; cv=none; b=RoY9GZM18HCp+QmvmdG8drRBlZUfWsq2N4O2me5nT+uhyVBLfy745equrHDa9Wpi9kGRGcm0hmYCuHOtsZIBQq0V5rjsepdGoXgluMBx2LsHnf5vuoRoahb7OpPzgWPMjkQ9tkIPcmYwFDXW5nbwalCghH6fFZwK+8Nps9MS+zA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787578003; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ieUGCkoqMVlzh0gnb0KsWabDx9j3/gnMjBb5umFPOhM=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=b2SnnxJ8Wg7vKVn2w2uPeiZBGhBQ7dntZhJsit8mHs1LKFEkHniZCjNLXLVpc2uU069wOQSeqH5G2JsExqUhIkNrW8gIy7lY0pkBgd3bCS1YOp0XwDCIYVWupSrvpcRLTTsIbjXAIe1wXPRpkVmedNHQB3dBfH1zEazizOjjglg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ZvmsNLDL; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ZvmsNLDL" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 21F3D1F000E9; Mon, 24 Aug 2026 13:26:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1787578002; bh=ieUGCkoqMVlzh0gnb0KsWabDx9j3/gnMjBb5umFPOhM=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=ZvmsNLDLBA1pjWgWlsYqxHEmwqfTRi3ep/aulIjiXukkWy1eL+090wT5uTnlbR43r lwigDejeOBKsFVPEIRf31ZEk2PJ5aNCo7Bb2Lr0gHKSxGV5LpSNMp0fUoNYmf32nKI haigSgdUK2LWOTdreE9GJ4SrFASOPka+A5AG7ChejNaIOD9TCgwGOzWJA2+xe982TH IszGjpzRBeCqt9ahKg5yjmIcnsxrI4uys/6F47i1kcxr9OAk/DZ9kwYlf5+QC3Gdd1 va5b6FIZGMjCrz2J2diG67rn2slra1/TfrUWYeKGBnwJ2344ibh7CbAlMMCHUXrHX+ mmGXSDEv2MZTg== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] s390/pai: Use PAI PMU index as parameter replacing event Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: "Thomas Richter" Cc: "Heiko Carstens" , "Alexander Gordeev" , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Christian Borntraeger" , "Vasily Gorbik" In-Reply-To: <20260824131751.179275-2-tmricht@linux.ibm.com> References: <20260824131751.179275-1-tmricht@linux.ibm.com> <20260824131751.179275-2-tmricht@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2026 13:26:41 +0000 Message-Id: <20260824132642.21F3D1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > Use PAI PMU index value as function argument instead of pointer > to struct perf_event. Only that index value is used inside > functions pai_alloc_cpu() and pai_event_destroy_cpu(). > No functional change. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260824131751.1792= 75-1-tmricht@linux.ibm.com?part=3D1