All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Joe Lawrence" <joe.lawrence@redhat.com>, live-patching@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Yafang Shao" <laoar.shao@gmail.com>,
	"Song Liu" <song@kernel.org>, "Petr Mladek" <pmladek@suse.com>,
	"Josh Poimboeuf" <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
	"Miroslav Benes" <mbenes@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/7] objtool: add target architecture to usage
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2026 19:57:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260826195751.CDA291F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260826195000.455905-5-joe.lawrence@redhat.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] Unintended macro expansion of architecture names during stringification results in an incorrect objtool usage string on certain architectures.
--

commit d81c5c3b288ffe16035a8655c9eb901dce1a358a
Author: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com>

objtool: add target architecture to usage
    
Display the target architecture in the objtool usage string so that
users can identify which arch variant of objtool they are running.

> diff --git a/tools/objtool/Makefile b/tools/objtool/Makefile
> index a4484fd22a96d..c73c80af5ef3d 100644
> --- a/tools/objtool/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/objtool/Makefile
> @@ -61,7 +61,8 @@ INCLUDES := -I$(srctree)/tools/include \
>  	    -I$(srctree)/tools/lib
>  
>  OBJTOOL_CFLAGS  := -std=gnu11 -fomit-frame-pointer -O2 -g $(WARNINGS)	\
> -		   $(INCLUDES) $(LIBELF_FLAGS) $(LIBXXHASH_CFLAGS) $(HOSTCFLAGS)
> +		   $(INCLUDES) $(LIBELF_FLAGS) $(LIBXXHASH_CFLAGS) $(HOSTCFLAGS) \
> +		   -DOBJTOOL_TARGET_ARCH=$(SRCARCH)

[Severity: Low]
Can passing the architecture name unquoted here cause a regression due to
compiler macro expansion?

For example, on architectures where the target name matches a predefined
compiler macro (like powerpc or sparc), OBJTOOL_TARGET_ARCH becomes an alias
to that predefined macro, which the preprocessor might then expand to a value
like 1.

[ ... ]

> diff --git a/tools/objtool/builtin-check.c b/tools/objtool/builtin-check.c
> index 75b11dc85010e..64651d90986fd 100644
> --- a/tools/objtool/builtin-check.c
> +++ b/tools/objtool/builtin-check.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -23,7 +24,7 @@ const char *objname;
>  struct opts opts;
>  
>  static const char * const check_usage[] = {
> -	"objtool <actions> [<options>] file.o",
> +	"objtool <actions> [<options>] file-" __stringify(OBJTOOL_TARGET_ARCH) ".o",

[Severity: Low]
Will this usage of __stringify() introduce a regression where the help string
is incorrect on certain architectures?

The __stringify() macro evaluates and expands its argument before converting it
to a string. If OBJTOOL_TARGET_ARCH evaluates to 1 due to predefined macros
as noted above, the resulting string will be "file-1.o" instead of
"file-powerpc.o".

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260826195000.455905-1-joe.lawrence@redhat.com?part=4

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-26 19:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-26 19:49 [RFC PATCH v2 0/7] klp-build: OOT module support Joe Lawrence
2026-08-26 19:49 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/7] objtool/klp: simplify read_exports file handling Joe Lawrence
2026-08-26 23:31   ` Song Liu
2026-09-10 14:35   ` Miroslav Benes
2026-08-26 19:49 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/7] objtool/klp: add --symvers option to klp diff Joe Lawrence
2026-08-26 23:31   ` Song Liu
2026-09-10 14:35   ` Miroslav Benes
2026-08-26 19:49 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/7] objtool/klp: allow special section entry size overrides Joe Lawrence
2026-08-27 19:17   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2026-08-26 19:49 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/7] objtool: add target architecture to usage Joe Lawrence
2026-08-26 19:57   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-27 19:23   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2026-08-26 19:49 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/7] livepatch/klp-build: add basic out-of-tree module support Joe Lawrence
2026-08-26 20:00   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-27 21:21   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2026-08-26 19:49 ` [RFC PATCH v2 6/7] livepatch/klp-build: add pre-built object support for advanced OOT workflows Joe Lawrence
2026-08-26 20:01   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-27 21:45   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2026-08-26 19:50 ` [RFC PATCH v2 7/7] livepatch/klp-build: add validation for user-supplied OOT objects Joe Lawrence

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260826195751.CDA291F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=joe.lawrence@redhat.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
    --cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.