From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: tarund18303@gmail.com
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/dp_link_caps: Validate max link rate
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2026 02:33:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260827023304.D8F7D1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260827022035.3442-1-tarund18303@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The newly added validation check in `max_link_limits_valid()` breaks existing KUnit tests in `intel_dp_link_test.c` because the mock `intel_dp` environment does not initialize `source_rates`.
--
commit 449b7e18bca4c6d9716f634b5437a3f267bbd539
Author: tarun-tarun143 <tarund18303@gmail.com>
drm/i915/dp_link_caps: Validate max link rate
This commit validates the maximum link rate against the source-supported rates
before using the limits to calculate allowed configurations. This prevents
unsupported link rates from being accepted as a maximum link limit.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_caps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_caps.c
> index 7b6cc6055da82..0934488153bbc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_caps.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_link_caps.c
> @@ -710,7 +710,10 @@ static bool max_link_limits_valid(struct intel_dp_link_caps *link_caps,
> !is_power_of_2(max_link_limits->lane_count))
> return false;
>
> - /* TODO: Validate max_link_limits->rate against the source supported rates. */
> + if (intel_dp_rate_index(link_caps->dp->source_rates,
> + link_caps->dp->num_source_rates,
> + max_link_limits->rate) < 0)
> + return false;
[Severity: Medium]
Does this change cause the KUnit tests in intel_dp_link_test.c to fail?
Looking at the mock environment initialization in intel_dp_link_test_init():
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/tests/intel_dp_link_test.c:intel_dp_link_test_init() {
/* Reset the dev state for each test. */
memset(&test_ctx.dev, 0, sizeof(test_ctx.dev));
...
intel_dp->link.caps = test_ctx.link_caps_ops->init(intel_dp);
}
The mock initialization zeroes the memory but does not populate source_rates
or num_source_rates, leaving them at 0 or NULL. As a result,
intel_dp_rate_index() will evaluate to -1 during the tests.
This causes unconditional test failures when setting max limits, for example
in verify_link_caps_for_order():
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/tests/intel_dp_link_test.c:verify_link_caps_for_order() {
...
KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test, ops->set_max_limits(link_caps, &old_max_limits));
}
Could the mock environment be updated to provide valid source_rates so the
tests can successfully pass this new validation check?
>
> intel_dp_link_caps_get_forced_params(link_caps, &forced_params);
> allowed_configs = calc_allowed_config_filter(link_caps, link_caps->enabled_configs,
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260827022035.3442-1-tarund18303@gmail.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-27 2:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-27 2:20 [PATCH] drm/i915/dp_link_caps: Validate max link rate tarund18303
2026-08-27 2:33 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-27 12:30 ` ✗ LGCI.VerificationFailed: failure for " Patchwork
2026-08-27 12:39 ` Patchwork
2026-09-09 12:16 ` [PATCH] " Jani Nikula
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260827023304.D8F7D1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tarund18303@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.