From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>,
Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>,
Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] mktree: plug per-tree leak in --batch mode
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2026 01:36:02 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260827053602.GA189659@coredump.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3f3b75690eea02960c7edc8d318ce7dff654f1bc.1787684429.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
On Tue, Aug 25, 2026 at 07:00:27PM +0000, Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget wrote:
> In --batch mode "git mktree" reuses its entry buffer across trees,
> resetting `used` to 0 after writing each tree. It never frees the
> `treeent` structures the previous tree appended, though, so once the
> next tree overwrites those slots the earlier allocations are leaked. A
> single-tree invocation hides this, as the entries stay reachable through
> the `entries` global until exit.
>
> Free each entry when resetting the buffer, and free the buffer itself
> before returning.
Yikes. It is sad that we did not catch this in our leak-checking builds,
as it implies that we do not test "mktree --batch" with multiple inputs.
Or grepping for "mktree.*--batch" implies that we do not test the
feature at all!
Looks like that feature comes from f1cf2d8b14 (mktree --batch: build
more than one tree object, 2009-05-14), so I am not surprised that test
coverage was a bit more spotty back then.
I guess you are going to add some coverage incidentally (or else you
would not have found this). That's better than nothing, but I suspect a
few basic directed "mktree --batch" tests would be a good thing to have
in t1010.
#leftoverbits, perhaps?
-Peff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-27 5:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-18 22:34 [PATCH 0/2] Objects treated as missing despite being present, due to race with geometric repacking Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2026-08-18 22:34 ` [PATCH 1/2] replay: fail gracefully when a merge input is unreadable Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2026-08-19 18:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-08-21 1:44 ` Elijah Newren
2026-08-21 3:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-08-18 22:34 ` [PATCH 2/2] packfile: recover when a multi-pack-index names a removed pack Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2026-08-19 18:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-08-20 7:54 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-08-21 1:36 ` Elijah Newren
2026-08-24 4:48 ` Jeff King
2026-08-24 5:13 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-08-24 6:55 ` Jeff King
2026-08-24 7:06 ` Jeff King
2026-08-24 7:23 ` Jeff King
2026-08-25 7:38 ` Elijah Newren
2026-08-24 4:55 ` Jeff King
2026-08-24 5:40 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-08-24 7:03 ` Jeff King
2026-08-25 7:19 ` Elijah Newren
2026-08-24 14:45 ` Derrick Stolee
2026-08-25 7:38 ` Elijah Newren
2026-08-24 14:46 ` Derrick Stolee
2026-08-25 19:00 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] Objects treated as missing despite being present, due to race with geometric repacking Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2026-08-25 19:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] replay: fail gracefully when a merge input is unreadable Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2026-08-25 19:00 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] mktree: plug per-tree leak in --batch mode Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2026-08-27 5:36 ` Jeff King [this message]
2026-08-25 19:00 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] packfile: recover object lookups racing a concurrent repack Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2026-08-27 5:57 ` Jeff King
2026-08-27 22:23 ` Elijah Newren
2026-08-29 11:32 ` Jeff King
2026-08-25 19:00 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] packfile: recover when a multi-pack-index names a removed pack Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2026-08-27 6:06 ` Jeff King
2026-08-28 7:29 ` Elijah Newren
2026-08-29 11:34 ` Jeff King
2026-08-29 7:00 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] Objects treated as missing despite being present, due to race with geometric repacking Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2026-08-29 7:00 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] replay: fail gracefully when a merge input is unreadable Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2026-08-29 7:00 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] mktree: plug per-tree leak in --batch mode Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2026-08-29 7:00 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] mktree: do not use OBJECT_INFO_QUICK when checking objects Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2026-08-29 11:46 ` Jeff King
2026-08-29 7:00 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] packfile: recover when a multi-pack-index names a removed pack Elijah Newren via GitGitGadget
2026-08-29 12:07 ` Jeff King
2026-08-30 20:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-08-31 10:43 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-08-31 23:10 ` Jeff King
2026-09-01 15:27 ` Derrick Stolee
2026-09-01 16:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-09-01 15:26 ` Derrick Stolee
2026-09-01 16:47 ` Elijah Newren
2026-09-01 17:12 ` Derrick Stolee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260827053602.GA189659@coredump.intra.peff.net \
--to=peff@peff.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=newren@gmail.com \
--cc=ps@pks.im \
--cc=stolee@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.