From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: wen.yang@linux.dev
Cc: linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] rv/reactors: add KUnit tests for reactor registration and dispatch
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2026 19:02:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260827190226.0DC7A1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ab4e483f66a7297fb5b9c247964051a7de4a7ab7.1787854397.git.wen.yang@linux.dev>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The test `test_react_callback_invoked` spuriously fails if the global reactor dispatch is disabled via sysfs.
- [Medium] The 5ms busy-wait in `mock_react` is mathematically insufficient to guarantee a timer interrupt on systems with HZ < 200, making the intended lockdep coverage flaky.
--
commit 2f80d797b5152331b6b88a29924dc870e4e2b6a0
Author: Wen Yang <wen.yang@linux.dev>
rv/reactors: add KUnit tests for reactor registration and dispatch
This commit adds KUnit tests for the RV reactor register/unregister lifecycle.
It includes coverage for duplicate registration, name-length rejection, and
verifying that rv_react() correctly dispatches to the callback.
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/rv/rv_reactors_kunit.c b/kernel/trace/rv/rv_reactors_kunit.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..2ccbe55ce4087
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/kernel/trace/rv/rv_reactors_kunit.c
[ ... ]
> +__printf(1, 0) static void mock_react(const char *msg, va_list args)
> +{
> + react_call_count++;
> + /* Busy-wait so a timer interrupt fires inside rv_react(). */
> + mdelay(5);
[Severity: Medium]
Will this 5ms busy-wait reliably trigger a timer interrupt on systems where
HZ < 200?
On systems configured with HZ=100, where ticks occur every 10ms, a 5ms delay
will only span a timer tick around half the time. Can this lead to flaky test
coverage when trying to exercise the LD_WAIT_SPIN lockdep wait context?
> +}
[ ... ]
> +static void test_react_callback_invoked(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct rv_monitor monitor = {
> + .name = "kunit_dispatch_monitor",
> + .react = mock_react,
> + };
> +
> + react_call_count = 0;
> + rv_react(&monitor, "callback invocation test");
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, react_call_count, 1);
[Severity: Medium]
Can this assertion spuriously fail if the global reacting_on state is
disabled?
If the test executes while the global state is disabled, such as via
/sys/kernel/tracing/rv/reacting_on, rv_react() short-circuits:
kernel/trace/rv/rv_reactors.c:rv_react() {
...
if (!rv_reacting_on() || !monitor->react)
return;
...
}
Will this cause the test to fail by not invoking the callback at all?
> +}
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1787854397.git.wen.yang@linux.dev?part=4
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-27 19:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-27 18:22 [PATCH v4 0/4] rv/reactors: fix lockdep warning and add KUnit tests wen.yang
2026-08-27 18:22 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] rv/reactors: use LD_WAIT_SPIN as the reactor lockdep wait type wen.yang
2026-08-27 18:36 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 9:48 ` Gabriele Monaco
2026-08-27 18:22 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] rv/reactors: propagate rv_register_reactor() error from reactor init wen.yang
2026-08-27 18:22 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] rv/reactors: export rv_register_reactor() and rv_unregister_reactor() wen.yang
2026-08-27 18:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-27 18:22 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] rv/reactors: add KUnit tests for reactor registration and dispatch wen.yang
2026-08-27 19:02 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260827190226.0DC7A1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=wen.yang@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.