All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daehyeon Ko <4ncienth@gmail.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
	Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] fanotify: destroy/add race leaves a mark on a detached connector
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2026 13:24:19 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260828042421.964822-1-4ncienth@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <yjfqzckumtd32dgqidi5sndvth2t67mjwah4kt4jiahlx2a5uf@if55sinfv5o7>

Hi Honza,

You are right that an fd-held dentry cannot satisfy the count == 1 check. I
was imprecise in the report: the fd and the final unlink refer to two
different hard-link dentries for the same inode.

The setup is:

  1. create A/x and link it as B/y;
  2. open B/y, add the old-group inode mark through that fd, then unlink
     B/y, leaving i_nlink == 1 while the fd retains the B/y dentry;
  3. race these two calls:

       unlink("A/x")

       fanotify_mark(racer_group, FAN_MARK_ADD, FAN_MODIFY,
                     victim_fd, NULL)

     where victim_fd still refers to the already unlinked B/y dentry.

So the A/x dentry checked by d_delete() is not held by the fd and can have
d_lockref.count == 1. Its unlink drops the inode's last link and reaches
dentry_unlink_inode() -> fsnotify_inoderemove(). At the same time,
fanotify_find_path() gets the same inode through the fd-held B/y dentry and
adds the racer mark.

Your suspicion matches this topology: __fsnotify_inode_delete() from
fsnotify_inoderemove() is running while the inode is still live and reachable
through the other, fd-held dentry. Deferring mark cleanup until
__destroy_inode() would avoid this particular add-versus-cleanup race. I have
not audited the broader consequences of that change yet.

I can send the exact reproducer privately if that would be useful.

Thanks,
Daehyeon

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-28  4:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-27  4:50 [BUG] fanotify: destroy/add race leaves a mark on a detached connector Daehyeon Ko
2026-08-27 12:45 ` Amir Goldstein
2026-08-27 16:30 ` Jan Kara
2026-08-28  4:24   ` Daehyeon Ko [this message]
2026-08-28  9:05     ` Jan Kara
2026-08-28 10:18       ` Amir Goldstein
2026-08-28 17:36         ` Jan Kara
2026-08-29 15:04           ` Amir Goldstein
2026-08-31 11:39             ` Jan Kara
2026-08-31 14:54               ` Amir Goldstein
2026-09-01 16:57                 ` Jan Kara
2026-09-01 21:53                   ` Amir Goldstein
2026-09-02  7:03                     ` Daehyeon Ko
2026-09-02  7:58                       ` Amir Goldstein
2026-09-02 21:50                         ` Daehyeon Ko
2026-09-03 13:07                           ` Amir Goldstein
2026-09-02 16:52                     ` Jan Kara
2026-09-02 17:08                       ` Amir Goldstein

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260828042421.964822-1-4ncienth@gmail.com \
    --to=4ncienth@gmail.com \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mszeredi@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.