From: Gang Yan <gang.yan@linux.dev>
To: mptcp@lists.linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH mptcp-next v5 0/6] mptcp: avoid data-races around the sysctls
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2026 14:06:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260828060643.14397-1-gang.yan@linux.dev> (raw)
From: Gang Yan <yangang@kylinos.cn>
Changelog:
v5:
- Patch 6 fixes the use-after-free reported by sashiko in [1]:
the module reference is now taken inside the same RCU read section as the
pointer fetch in mptcp_pm_data_reset(), so the ops cannot be freed between
rcu_read_unlock() and the bpf_try_module_get() that previously lived in
mptcp_pm_ops_init(). The reference hand-over is seamless: RCU protects
the fetch, the refcount protects the use. As a consequence,
mptcp_pm_ops_init() now expects an already-pinned ops and no longer takes
a reference itself; the fallback to the built-in mptcp_pm_kernel needs no
reference.
v4:
Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/mptcp/cover/20260824073625.57471-1-gang.yan@linux.dev/
v3:
Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/mptcp/cover/20260819125629.49823-1-gang.yan@linux.dev/
v2:
Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/mptcp/cover/20260818094825.48446-1-gang.yan@linux.dev/
v2:
Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/mptcp/cover/20260817012452.7519-1-gang.yan@linux.dev/
[1] https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260824073625.57471-1-gang.yan@linux.dev?part=6
Gang Yan (5):
mptcp: sched: change scheduler sysctl atomically
mptcp: pm: change path_manager sysctl atomically
mptcp: pm: use WRITE_ONCE() for the pm_type sysctl
Squash-to "mptcp: pm: init and release mptcp_pm_ops"
Squash to previous one
Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) (1):
mptcp: use READ_ONCE() over sysctls
net/mptcp/ctrl.c | 141 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
net/mptcp/pm.c | 65 ++++++++++++++------
net/mptcp/protocol.c | 7 ++-
net/mptcp/protocol.h | 9 +--
net/mptcp/sched.c | 2 +-
net/mptcp/subflow.c | 9 ++-
6 files changed, 172 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-08-28 6:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-28 6:06 Gang Yan [this message]
2026-08-28 6:06 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v5 1/6] mptcp: sched: change scheduler sysctl atomically Gang Yan
2026-08-28 6:06 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v5 2/6] mptcp: pm: change path_manager " Gang Yan
2026-08-28 6:06 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v5 3/6] mptcp: use READ_ONCE() over sysctls Gang Yan
2026-08-28 6:06 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v5 4/6] mptcp: pm: use WRITE_ONCE() for the pm_type sysctl Gang Yan
2026-08-28 6:06 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v5 5/6] Squash-to "mptcp: pm: init and release mptcp_pm_ops" Gang Yan
2026-08-28 6:06 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v5 6/6] Squash to previous one Gang Yan
2026-08-28 6:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-28 7:14 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v5 0/6] mptcp: avoid data-races around the sysctls MPTCP CI
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260828060643.14397-1-gang.yan@linux.dev \
--to=gang.yan@linux.dev \
--cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.